Inokuchi Junichi, Naito Seiji, Fujimoto Hiroyuki, Hara Tomohiko, Sakura Mizuaki, Nishiyama Hiroyuki, Miyazaki Jun, Kikuchi Eiji, Hinotsu Shiro, Koie Takuya, Ohyama Chikara
Working Group of the Renal Pelvic and Ureteral Cancer, Cancer Registration Committee of the Japanese Urological Association, Fukuoka, Japan.
Department of Urology, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan.
Int J Urol. 2016 Mar;23(3):224-30. doi: 10.1111/iju.13031. Epub 2015 Dec 14.
To describe the nature of metastatic upper urinary tract urothelial cancer and determine the prognostic predictors or treatment modality associated with all-cause mortality.
Within the nationwide case series study of the Japanese Urological Association, consisting of 1509 patients with urinary tract urothelial cancer diagnosed in 2005, we identified 102 patients with metastatic urinary tract urothelial cancer. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses identified prognostic outcome variables.
Predominant sites of distant metastasis at diagnosis were the lungs (54.9%), distant lymph nodes (37.3%), bone (32.4%) and liver (19.6%). Of 102 patients, 70 patients (68.6%) died during the median follow-up period of 6 months, and the 2-year overall survival rate was estimated at 22%. The median survival time to all-cause mortality was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval 6.4-10.7 months). On multivariate analysis, independent predictive factors for all-cause mortality were age (hazard ratio 2.36, P = 0.015) and liver metastasis (hazard ratio 2.35, P = 0.037). Patients who received multimodal treatment including chemotherapy and surgery showed significantly better prognosis (median survival time 25.8 months) compared with patients treated with chemotherapy alone (median survival time 7.3 months) or best supportive care (median survival time 4.3 months).
Age at diagnosis and the presence of liver metastasis seem to have an impact on survival of metastatic urinary tract urothelial cancer patients. Multimodal treatment including systemic chemotherapy and surgery might result in better prognosis in some of these patients.
描述转移性上尿路尿路上皮癌的特征,并确定与全因死亡率相关的预后预测因素或治疗方式。
在日本泌尿外科学会的全国病例系列研究中,该研究包含2005年诊断的1509例尿路尿路上皮癌患者,我们确定了102例转移性尿路尿路上皮癌患者。单因素和多因素生存分析确定了预后结果变量。
诊断时远处转移的主要部位是肺(54.9%)、远处淋巴结(37.3%)、骨(32.4%)和肝(19.6%)。102例患者中,70例(68.6%)在中位随访期6个月内死亡,2年总生存率估计为22%。全因死亡率的中位生存时间为8.5个月(95%置信区间6.4 - 10.7个月)。多因素分析显示,全因死亡率的独立预测因素是年龄(风险比2.36,P = 0.015)和肝转移(风险比2.35,P = 0.037)。接受包括化疗和手术在内的多模式治疗的患者,与单纯接受化疗(中位生存时间7.3个月)或最佳支持治疗(中位生存时间4.3个月)的患者相比,预后明显更好(中位生存时间25.8个月)。
诊断时的年龄和肝转移的存在似乎对转移性尿路尿路上皮癌患者的生存有影响。包括全身化疗和手术在内的多模式治疗可能会使部分此类患者预后更好。