Suppr超能文献

过量的红细胞被送往手术室。

Excessive quantities of red blood cells are issued to the operating room.

作者信息

Collins R A, Wisniewski M K, Waters J H, Triulzi D J, Alarcon L H, Yazer M H

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh.

The Donald D. Wolff Jr. Center for Quality, Safety, and Innovation, UPMC.

出版信息

Transfus Med. 2015 Dec;25(6):374-9. doi: 10.1111/tme.12263. Epub 2015 Dec 10.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To determine what percentage of red blood cell (RBC) units that were issued to the operating room (OR) were returned unused, and to determine how often all of the RBCs that were issued for a patient were returned unused using the institution's maximum surgical blood ordering schedule (MSBOS) as a guide.

BACKGROUND

The MSBOS provides guidelines for blood ordering, but is merely a suggestion for the ordering clinicians. This study examined how closely ordering practices followed the MSBOS, and how often ordered RBCs were actually transfused.

METHODS

For a 4-week period, RBC issue and utilization data were collected on elective surgery patients who were eligible for electronic cross-match at a tertiary care hospital. These data were compared to the MSBOS.

RESULTS

There were 1350 surgical procedures performed. Of these cases, 439 patients had a type and screen (T&S) performed, and 215/439 (49%) patients had at least 1 RBC issued during their case. To these 215 patients, 742 RBC units were issued and 537/742 (72%) of these units were returned to the blood bank unused. In 152/215 (71%) cases with issued RBCs, all of the RBCs were returned to the blood bank unused. Amongst the surgical categories in this study, the percentage of cases where none of the issued RBCs were transfused ranged from 38 to 93%.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant numbers of RBC units are issued but not transfused during surgery. Involving the surgical team in the blood issuing process and using a data-driven MSBOS may reduce the number of unused units.

摘要

目的

确定发放至手术室(OR)的红细胞(RBC)单位中有多少未使用而被退回,并以机构的最大手术用血订购计划(MSBOS)为指导,确定为患者发放的所有RBC未使用而被退回的频率。

背景

MSBOS为用血订购提供指导方针,但对订购临床医生而言仅仅是一个建议。本研究调查了订购实践与MSBOS的符合程度,以及订购的RBC实际输注的频率。

方法

在4周的时间内,收集了一家三级护理医院中符合电子交叉配血条件的择期手术患者的RBC发放和使用数据。将这些数据与MSBOS进行比较。

结果

共进行了1350例外科手术。在这些病例中,439例患者进行了血型和筛查(T&S),其中215/439(49%)例患者在手术期间至少发放了1个RBC单位。在这215例患者中,共发放了742个RBC单位,其中537/742(72%)个单位未使用而被退回血库。在发放了RBC的152/215(71%)例病例中,所有发放的RBC均未使用而被退回血库。在本研究的外科类别中,未输注任何发放的RBC的病例百分比在38%至93%之间。

结论

手术期间发放了大量RBC单位但未被输注。让手术团队参与用血发放过程并使用数据驱动的MSBOS可能会减少未使用单位的数量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验