Wan Bing, Fu Hai-Yan, Yin Jiang-Tao, Ren Guo-Qing
Department of Intensive Care Unit, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Department of General Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212001, P.R. China.
Exp Ther Med. 2015 Dec;10(6):2331-2336. doi: 10.3892/etm.2015.2795. Epub 2015 Oct 13.
The efficacy and safety of physiotherapeutic prophylaxis for venous thromboembolism in critically ill patients with heparin contraindication remains unclear. In the present study it was hypothesized that physiotherapy prophylaxis with intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC) would be safe and effective for patients unable to receive low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH). In addition, this study investigated whether a combined therapy of IPC with LMWH would be more effective for the prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in critical patients. A total of 500 patients were divided into four groups according to the prophylaxis of DVT. The IPC group consisted of 95 patients with heparin contraindication that received IPC treatment; the LMWH group consisted of 185 patients that received an LMWH injection; the LMWH + IPC group consisted of 75 patients that received IPC treatment and LMWH injection; and the control group consisted of 145 patients that received no IPC treatment or injection of LMWH. Each patient was evaluated clinically for development of DVT and the diagnosis was confirmed by Doppler study. Venous thromboembolism was a common complication among the trauma patients with severe injuries. Patients responded positively to the treatment used in the intervention groups. Patients exhibited an improved response to LMWH + ICP compared with IPC or LMWH alone, while no significant difference was detected between the IPC and LMWH groups. These results were applicable to patients that had a Wells score of ≥3; however, no significant differences in DVT incidence were observed among the patients who had a Wells score of <3. In this observational study, LMWH + ICP appeared to be more effective than either treatment alone in treating critically ill trauma patients with severe injuries that are at high risk for VTE and bleeding simultaneously.
对于肝素禁忌的重症患者,物理治疗预防静脉血栓栓塞的疗效和安全性仍不明确。在本研究中,我们假设对于无法接受低分子量肝素(LMWH)治疗的患者,采用间歇性气动压迫(IPC)进行物理治疗预防是安全有效的。此外,本研究还调查了IPC与LMWH联合治疗对重症患者预防深静脉血栓形成(DVT)是否更有效。根据DVT预防措施,将500例患者分为四组。IPC组由95例有肝素禁忌且接受IPC治疗的患者组成;LMWH组由185例接受LMWH注射的患者组成;LMWH + IPC组由75例接受IPC治疗和LMWH注射的患者组成;对照组由145例未接受IPC治疗或LMWH注射的患者组成。对每位患者进行DVT发生情况的临床评估,并通过多普勒检查确诊。静脉血栓栓塞是重伤创伤患者的常见并发症。患者对干预组使用的治疗反应良好。与单独使用IPC或LMWH相比,患者对LMWH + ICP的反应有所改善,而IPC组和LMWH组之间未检测到显著差异。这些结果适用于Wells评分≥3的患者;然而,Wells评分<3的患者中,DVT发生率未观察到显著差异。在这项观察性研究中,对于同时存在VTE和出血高风险的重伤重症创伤患者,LMWH + ICP似乎比单独使用任何一种治疗方法都更有效。