Ibrahim Lauren A, Sellick John A, Watson Elaine L, McCabe Lisa M, Schoenhals Karen A, Martinello Richard A, Lesse Alan J
1Department of Medicine,University at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
2VA Western New York Healthcare System at Buffalo,Buffalo,New York.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Mar;37(3):306-12. doi: 10.1017/ice.2015.306. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
To describe an outbreak of severe Group A Streptococcus (GAS) infections that appeared to be associated with use of a biologic dermal substitute on foot wounds
Retrospective cohort study of cases and similar uninfected patients
SETTING/PATIENTS: Patients attending the podiatry clinic at a Veterans Affairs Medical Center between July 2011 and November 2011 INTERVENTIONS: Microbiology laboratory data were reviewed for the calendar year, a case definition was established and use of the biologic dermal substitute was discontinued. Staff were cultured to identify potentially colonized employees. A case-cohort study was designed to investigate risk factors for disease. Emm typing and pulsed field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) were performed to identify strain similarity.
In 10 months, 14 cases were identified, and 4 of these patients died. All strains were emm type 28 and were identical according to PFGE. Discontinuation of biologic dermal substitute use halted the outbreak. A prior stroke was more common in the case cohort vs uninfected patient cohorts. The number of patients attending the clinic on 13 probable transmission days was significantly higher than on nontransmission days. We identified 2 patients who were present in the clinic on all but 1 probable transmission day. Surveillance cultures of podiatry clinic staff and cultures of the same lot of retained graft material were negative.
A carrier was not identified, and we believe the outbreak was associated with inter-patient transmission likely due to lapses in infection control techniques. No additional cases have been identified in >3 years following the resumption of dermal substitute use in May 2012.
描述一起严重的A组链球菌(GAS)感染暴发事件,该事件似乎与足部伤口使用生物真皮替代物有关
对病例和未感染的类似患者进行回顾性队列研究
地点/患者:2011年7月至2011年11月期间在退伍军人事务医疗中心足病诊所就诊的患者
回顾了日历年的微生物实验室数据,确定了病例定义并停用了生物真皮替代物。对工作人员进行培养以识别可能定植的员工。设计了一项病例队列研究以调查疾病的危险因素。进行了Emm分型和脉冲场凝胶电泳(PFGE)以确定菌株的相似性。
在10个月内,共确定了14例病例,其中4例患者死亡。所有菌株均为emm型28,根据PFGE结果相同。停用生物真皮替代物后暴发停止。与未感染患者队列相比,病例队列中既往中风更为常见。在13个可能的传播日就诊的患者数量明显高于非传播日。我们确定了2名患者,除1个可能的传播日外,他们在诊所的所有可能传播日都在。足病诊所工作人员的监测培养以及同一批次留存移植物材料的培养均为阴性。
未识别出携带者,我们认为此次暴发与患者间传播有关,可能是由于感染控制技术存在失误。2012年5月恢复使用真皮替代物后,3年多来未发现其他病例。