James Henry, Tayem Yasin I Y, Al Khaja K A J, Veeramuthu Sindhan, Sequeira Reginald P
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
J Clin Pharmacol. 2016 Aug;56(8):1028-34. doi: 10.1002/jcph.692. Epub 2016 Feb 22.
Medical students do not perform well in writing prescriptions, and the 3 variables-learner, teacher, and instructional method-are held responsible to various degrees. The objective of this clinical pharmacology educational intervention was to improve medical students' perceptions, motivation, and participation in prescription-writing sessions. The study participants were second-year medical students of the College of Medicine and Medical Sciences of the Arabian Gulf University, Bahrain. Two prescription-writing sessions were conducted using clinical case scenarios based on problems the students had studied as part of the problem-based learning curriculum. At the end of the respiratory system subunit, the training was conducted in small groups, each facilitated by a tutor. At the end of the cardiovascular system subunit, the training was conducted in a traditional large-group classroom setting. Data were collected with the help of a questionnaire at the end of each session and a focus group discussion. A majority of the students (95.3% ± 2.4%) perceived the small-group method better for teaching and learning of all aspects of prescription writing: analyzing the clinical case scenario, applying clinical pharmacology knowledge for therapeutic reasoning, using a formulary for searching relevant prescribing information, and in writing a complete prescription. Students also endorsed the small-group method for better interaction among themselves and with the tutor and for the ease of asking questions and clarifying doubts. In view of the principles of adult learning, where motivation and interaction are important, teaching and learning prescription writing in small groups deserve a serious consideration in medical curricula.
医学生在书写处方方面表现不佳,学习者、教师和教学方法这三个变量在不同程度上被认为负有责任。这项临床药理学教育干预的目的是提高医学生对处方书写课程的认知、积极性和参与度。研究参与者是巴林阿拉伯海湾大学医学与医学科学学院的二年级医学生。使用基于学生在基于问题的学习课程中所学问题的临床病例场景进行了两次处方书写课程。在呼吸系统亚单元结束时,培训以小组形式进行,每组由一名导师指导。在心血管系统亚单元结束时,培训在传统的大组课堂环境中进行。在每次课程结束时通过问卷调查和焦点小组讨论收集数据。大多数学生(95.3%±2.4%)认为小组方法在处方书写的各个方面的教学和学习中更好:分析临床病例场景、应用临床药理学知识进行治疗推理、使用处方集搜索相关处方信息以及书写完整的处方。学生们还认可小组方法能使他们之间以及与导师之间有更好的互动,并且便于提问和消除疑虑。鉴于成人学习原则中动机和互动很重要,在医学课程中,小组教学和学习处方书写值得认真考虑。