Nagy Zsófia Brigitta, Wichmann Barnabás, Kalmár Alexandra, Barták Barbara Kinga, Tulassay Zsolt, Molnár Béla
Cell Analysis Laboratory, 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Semmelweis University, Szentkirályi Str. 46, Budapest, 1088, Hungary.
Molecular Medicine Research Unit, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary.
Pathol Oncol Res. 2016 Jul;22(3):505-13. doi: 10.1007/s12253-015-0027-4. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
MiRNA remain stable for detection and PCR-based amplification in FFPE tissue samples. Several miRNA extraction kits are available, however miRNA fraction, as part of total RNA can be isolated using total RNA purification methods, as well. Our primary aim was to compare four different miRNA and total RNA isolation methods from FFPE tissues. Further purposes were to evaluate quantitatively and qualitatively the yield of the isolated miRNA. MiRNAs were isolated from normal colorectal cancer FFPE specimens from the same patients. Two miRNA isolation kits (High Pure miRNA Isolation Kit, miRCURY™ RNA Isolation Kit) and two total RNA isolation kits were compared (High Pure RNA Paraffin Kit, MagNA Pure 96 Cellular RNA LV Kit). Quantity and quality were determined, expression analysis was performed by real-time PCR using qPCR Human Panel I + II (Exiqon) method detecting 742 human miRNAs in parallel. The yield of total RNA was found to be higher than miRNA purification protocols (in CRC: Ex: 0203 ± 0021 μg; HPm: 1,45 ± 0,8 μg; HPp: 21,36 ± 4,98 μg; MP: 8,6 ± 5,1 μg). MiRNAs were detected in lower relative quantity of total RNA compared to the miRNA kits. Higher number of miRNAs could be detected by the miRNA isolation kits in comparison to the total RNA isolation methods. (Ex: 497 ± 16; HPm: 542 ± 11; HPp: 332 ± 36; MP: 295 ± 74). Colon specific miRNAs (miR-21-5p;-34-5p) give satisfying results by miRNA isolation kits. Although miRNA can be detected also after total RNA isolation methods, for reliable and reproducible miRNA expression profiling the use of miRNA isolation kits are more suitable.
微小RNA(miRNA)在福尔马林固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)组织样本中对于检测和基于聚合酶链反应(PCR)的扩增而言保持稳定。有几种miRNA提取试剂盒可供使用,然而,作为总RNA一部分的miRNA组分也可以使用总RNA纯化方法来分离。我们的主要目的是比较从FFPE组织中分离miRNA和总RNA的四种不同方法。进一步的目的是对分离出的miRNA的产量进行定量和定性评估。从同一患者的正常结直肠癌FFPE标本中分离出miRNA。比较了两种miRNA分离试剂盒(高纯miRNA分离试剂盒、miRCURY™RNA分离试剂盒)和两种总RNA分离试剂盒(高纯RNA石蜡试剂盒、MagNA Pure 96细胞RNA大容量试剂盒)。测定了产量和质量,使用qPCR人类I+II组(Exiqon)方法通过实时PCR进行表达分析,该方法可同时检测742种人类miRNA。发现总RNA的产量高于miRNA纯化方案(在结直肠癌中:Ex:0.203±0.021μg;HPm:1.45±0.8μg;HPp:21.36±4.98μg;MP:8.6±5.1μg)。与miRNA试剂盒相比,在总RNA中检测到的miRNA相对量较低。与总RNA分离方法相比,miRNA分离试剂盒能够检测到更多数量的miRNA。(Ex:497±16;HPm:542±11;HPp:332±36;MP:295±74)。结肠特异性miRNA(miR-21-5p;-34-5p)通过miRNA分离试剂盒可得到令人满意的结果。虽然在总RNA分离方法之后也可以检测到miRNA,但为了进行可靠且可重复的miRNA表达谱分析,使用miRNA分离试剂盒更为合适。