Cancer Res Treat. 2002 Jun;34(3):186-90. doi: 10.4143/crt.2002.34.3.186.
The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) does not increase morbidity in patients undergoing radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy for locally advanced cervical cancer. MATERIALS AND METGODS: A retrospective study was undertaken of 140 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (FIGO stage Ia to IIb) who underwent radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy by the same surgeon at the same hospital. Among the 140 patients, 39 received NACT followed by radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (NACT group). This group received three cycles consisting of cisplatin 100 mg/m2/day on day 1 and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2/day from day 1 to 5. The NACT group was compared, in terms of intraoperative morbidity and postoperative morbidity, with the other 101 patients who underwent radical hysterectomy with lymphadenectomy but without chemotherapy (surgery-only group).
There were no significant differences in mean age, body weight or height between the two groups. The only significant difference was that the NACT patients had higher stages of cancer. The incidence of intraoperative morbidity did not differ between the NACT and surgery only patients. We considered the operation duration, amount of blood loss and need for transfusion as indicators of intraoperative morbidity. We could not find any significant differences in the duration of suprapubic catheterization, days of hemovac drainage, amount of drained hemovac fluid, days of hospitalization or postoperative febrile morbidity between the NACT and surgery-only groups. Patients in the surgery-only group had more postoperative complications (ureteral obstruction, intestinal obstruction, lymphocyst, lymphedema, and death) than the NACT group, although not to a statistically significant degree (P>0.05).
In this retrospective review, there was no evidence that NACT increased intraoperative or postoperative morbidity in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. As this was a retrospective study, other prospective, randomized studies are needed to confirm these results.
本研究旨在验证这样一个假设,即新辅助化疗(NACT)不会增加局部晚期宫颈癌患者接受根治性子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的发病率。
对在同一医院由同一位外科医生进行根治性子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术的 140 例局部晚期宫颈癌(FIGO 分期 Ia 至 IIb)患者进行了回顾性研究。在这 140 例患者中,39 例接受了新辅助化疗后行根治性子宫切除术和盆腔淋巴结切除术(NACT 组)。该组接受了三个周期的化疗,方案为顺铂 100mg/m2/天,第 1 天;氟尿嘧啶 1000mg/m2/天,第 1 天至第 5 天。NACT 组与另外 101 例仅接受根治性子宫切除术和淋巴结切除术而未接受化疗的患者(单纯手术组)进行了术中发病率和术后发病率比较。
两组患者的平均年龄、体重或身高无显著差异。唯一显著的差异是 NACT 患者的癌症分期更高。NACT 组和单纯手术组患者的术中发病率无显著差异。我们将手术时间、出血量和输血需求作为术中发病率的指标。我们未发现 NACT 组和单纯手术组在耻骨上导尿管留置时间、引流血量、引流血量、住院天数或术后发热发病率方面存在显著差异。单纯手术组患者的术后并发症(输尿管梗阻、肠梗阻、淋巴囊肿、淋巴水肿和死亡)多于 NACT 组,但无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
在这项回顾性研究中,没有证据表明 NACT 增加了局部晚期宫颈癌患者的术中或术后发病率。由于这是一项回顾性研究,需要其他前瞻性、随机研究来证实这些结果。