Sumner Anne E, Duong Michelle T, Aldana Paola C, Ricks Madia, Tulloch-Reid Marshall K, Lozier Jay N, Chung Stephanie T, Sacks David B
Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Obesity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
Diabetes, Endocrinology, and Obesity Branch, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD.
Diabetes Care. 2016 Feb;39(2):271-7. doi: 10.2337/dc15-1699. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
Slowing the diabetes epidemic in Africa requires improved detection of prediabetes. A1C, a form of glycated hemoglobin A, is recommended for diagnosing prediabetes. The glycated proteins, fructosamine and glycated albumin (GA), are hemoglobin-independent alternatives to A1C, but their efficacy in Africans is unknown. Our goals were to determine the ability of A1C, fructosamine, and GA to detect prediabetes in U.S.-based Africans and the value of combining A1C with either fructosamine or GA.
Oral glucose tolerance tests (OGTT) were performed in 217 self-identified healthy African immigrants (69% male, age 39 ± 10 years [mean ± SD], BMI 27.6 ± 4.5 kg/m(2)). A1C, fructosamine, and GA were measured. Prediabetes was diagnosed by American Diabetes Association criteria for glucose obtained from a 2-h OGTT. The thresholds to diagnose prediabetes by A1C, fructosamine, and GA were the cutoff at the upper tertile for each variable: ≥5.7% (39 mmol/mol) (range 4.2-6.6% [22.4-48.6 mmol/mol]), ≥230 µmol/L (range 161-269 µmol/L), and ≥13.35% (range 10.20-16.07%), respectively.
Prediabetes occurred in 34% (74 of 217). The diagnostic sensitivities of A1C, fructosamine, and GA were 50%, 41%, and 42%, respectively. The P values for comparison with A1C were both >0.3. Combining A1C with either fructosamine or GA increased sensitivities. However, the sensitivity of A1C combined with fructosamine was not better than for A1C alone (72% vs. 50%, P = 0.172). In contrast, the sensitivity of A1C combined with GA was higher than for A1C alone (78% vs. 50%, P < 0.001).
As individual tests, A1C, fructosamine, and GA detected ≤50% of Africans with prediabetes. However, combining A1C with GA made it possible to identify nearly 80% of Africans with prediabetes.
减缓非洲的糖尿病流行需要改善对糖尿病前期的检测。糖化血红蛋白A1C被推荐用于诊断糖尿病前期。糖化蛋白、果糖胺和糖化白蛋白(GA)是不依赖血红蛋白的A1C替代指标,但它们在非洲人中的有效性尚不清楚。我们的目标是确定A1C、果糖胺和GA检测美国非洲裔人群中糖尿病前期的能力,以及将A1C与果糖胺或GA联合使用的价值。
对217名自我认定为健康的非洲移民进行口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)(69%为男性,年龄39±10岁[均值±标准差],BMI 27.6±4.5kg/m²)。检测A1C、果糖胺和GA。根据美国糖尿病协会从2小时OGTT获得的血糖标准诊断糖尿病前期。A1C、果糖胺和GA诊断糖尿病前期的阈值分别为各变量上三分位数的临界值:≥5.7%(39 mmol/mol)(范围4.2 - 6.6%[22.4 - 48.6 mmol/mol])、≥230 µmol/L(范围161 - 269 µmol/L)和≥13.35%(范围10.20 - 16.07%)。
217人中有34%(74人)患有糖尿病前期。A1C、果糖胺和GA的诊断敏感性分别为50%、41%和42%。与A1C比较的P值均>0.3。将A1C与果糖胺或GA联合使用可提高敏感性。然而,A1C与果糖胺联合使用的敏感性并不优于单独使用A1C(72%对50%,P = 0.172)。相比之下,A1C与GA联合使用的敏感性高于单独使用A1C(78%对50%,P < 0.001)。
作为单独检测方法,A1C、果糖胺和GA检测出的糖尿病前期非洲人≤50%。然而,将A1C与GA联合使用能够识别近80%的糖尿病前期非洲人。