Dural Ozlem, Yasa Cenk, Bastu Ercan, Ugurlucan Funda Gungor, Can Sultan, Yilmaz Gamze, Buyru Faruk
Istanbul University School of Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Istanbul, Turkey.
JSLS. 2015 Sep-Dec;19(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2015.00085.
Since little is known regarding the correlation between different techniques used during hysteroscopic septoplasty and reproductives outcomes, we amied to evaluate the results of two different techniques of hysteroscopic septoplasty (HS).
Data were retrospectively reviewed on 49 patients who underwent HS for symptomatic septate uterus from January 1, 2010, through April 30, 2014. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the HS technique used. Group I consisted of 27 patients who underwent HS by monopolar hook cautery with the operating hysteroscope. Group II consisted of 22 patients who had the procedure performed with scissors and guided by an office hysteroscope. All the procedures in the both groups were performed in the operating room under general anesthesia. Pregnancy outcomes within the first year after HS for both groups were evaluated.
Reproductive outcomes were obtained from 44 patients who attempted to conceive after HS within the first year. In the 25 patients in group I, 23 had pregnancies, of which 15 (65.2%) continued to term, 3 (13%) ended in a preterm live birth, and 5 (21.7%) ended in loss of pregnancy (abortion). In the 19 patients in group II, there were 17 pregnancies, of which 11 (64.7%) continued to term, 2 (11.7%) ended in a preterm live birth, and 4 (23.5%) ended in first- or second-trimester abortion. The overall live-birth rate was 78.2% in group I and 76.4% in group II (P = .85).
Our data show that the rates of pregnancy that reach term and overall rates of live births are similar between the 2 HS techniques. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the impact of the techniques on reproductive outcomes.
由于对于宫腔镜子宫中隔切除术所采用的不同技术与生殖结局之间的相关性了解甚少,我们旨在评估两种不同的宫腔镜子宫中隔切除术(HS)技术的效果。
回顾性分析2010年1月1日至2014年4月30日期间因症状性中隔子宫接受HS的49例患者的数据。根据所采用的HS技术将患者分为2组。第一组由27例使用单极钩电灼结合手术宫腔镜进行HS的患者组成。第二组由22例使用剪刀并在门诊宫腔镜引导下进行该手术的患者组成。两组的所有手术均在手术室全身麻醉下进行。评估两组HS术后第一年的妊娠结局。
44例在HS术后第一年尝试受孕的患者获得了生殖结局。第一组的25例患者中,23例怀孕,其中15例(65.2%)足月分娩,3例(13%)早产活产,5例(21.7%)妊娠丢失(流产)。第二组的19例患者中,有17例怀孕,其中11例(64.7%)足月分娩,2例(11.7%)早产活产,4例(23.5%)在孕早期或孕中期流产。第一组的总体活产率为78.2%,第二组为76.4%(P = 0.85)。
我们的数据表明,两种HS技术的足月妊娠率和总体活产率相似。需要进一步研究来评估这些技术对生殖结局的影响。