Akther Hasna, Agersted Mette Dalgaard, Olesen Jørgen
Natural History Museum of Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
National Institute of Aquatic Resources, Section for Oceanography and Climate, Technical University of Denmark, Charlottenlund, Denmark.
PLoS One. 2015 Dec 18;10(12):e0141955. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141955. eCollection 2015.
The presence of a characteristic crustacean larval type, the nauplius, in many crustacean taxa has often been considered one of the few uniting characters of the Crustacea. Within Malacostraca, the largest crustacean group, nauplii are only present in two taxa, Euphauciacea (krill) and Decapoda Dendrobranchiata. The presence of nauplii in these two taxa has traditionally been considered a retained primitive characteristic, but free-living nauplii have also been suggested to have reappeared a couple of times from direct developing ancestors during malacostracan evolution. Based on a re-study of Thysanoessa raschii (Euphausiacea) using preserved material collected in Greenland, we readdress this important controversy in crustacean evolution, and, in the process, redescribe the naupliar and metanaupliar development of T. raschii. In contrast to most previous studies of euphausiid development, we recognize three (not two) naupliar (= ortho-naupliar) stages (N1-N3) followed by a metanauplius (MN). While there are many morphological changes between nauplius 1 and 2 (e.g., appearance of long caudal setae), the changes between nauplius 2 and 3 are few but distinct. They involve the size of some caudal spines (largest in N3) and the setation of the antennal endopod (an extra seta in N3). A wider comparison between free-living nauplii of both Malacostraca and non-Malacostraca revealed similarities between nauplii in many taxa both at the general level (e.g., the gradual development and number of appendages) and at the more detailed level (e.g., unclear segmentation of naupliar appendages, caudal setation, presence of frontal filaments). We recognize these similarities as homologies and therefore suggest that free-living nauplii were part of the ancestral malacostracan type of development. The derived morphology (e.g., lack of feeding structures, no fully formed gut, high content of yolk) of both euphausiid and dendrobranchiate nauplii is evidently related to their non-feeding (lecithotrophic) status.
在许多甲壳类分类群中,具有特征性的甲壳类幼虫类型——无节幼体,常被视为甲壳纲为数不多的共同特征之一。在软甲纲(最大的甲壳类动物类群)中,无节幼体仅存在于两个分类群中,即磷虾目(磷虾)和十足目枝鳃亚目。传统上,这两个分类群中无节幼体的存在被认为是保留的原始特征,但也有人提出,在软甲纲动物的进化过程中,自由生活的无节幼体曾几次从直接发育的祖先中再次出现。基于对在格陵兰收集的保存材料对拉氏磷虾(磷虾目)进行的重新研究,我们重新审视了甲壳类动物进化中的这一重要争议,并在此过程中重新描述了拉氏磷虾无节幼体和后无节幼体的发育过程。与之前大多数对磷虾发育的研究不同,我们识别出三个(而非两个)无节幼体(= 正无节幼体)阶段(N1 - N3),随后是一个后无节幼体(MN)。虽然无节幼体1和2之间有许多形态变化(例如,长尾刚毛的出现),但无节幼体2和3之间的变化较少但很明显。它们涉及一些尾刺的大小(在N3中最大)和触角内肢的刚毛排列(N3中有一根额外的刚毛)。对软甲纲和非软甲纲自由生活无节幼体的更广泛比较揭示了许多分类群中无节幼体在一般水平(例如,附肢的逐渐发育和数量)和更详细水平(例如,无节幼体附肢不清晰的分节、尾刚毛排列、额丝的存在)上的相似性。我们将这些相似性视为同源性,因此认为自由生活的无节幼体是软甲纲祖先发育类型的一部分。磷虾目和枝鳃亚目无节幼体的衍生形态(例如,缺乏摄食结构、没有完全形成的肠道、高卵黄含量)显然与其非摄食(卵黄营养)状态有关。