Norli Hans Ragnar, Christiansen Agnethe L, Stuveseth Kari
a Norwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research , Plant Health and Biotechnology Division, Pesticide Chemistry Section , Ås , Norway.
Food Addit Contam Part A Chem Anal Control Expo Risk Assess. 2016;33(2):300-12. doi: 10.1080/19440049.2015.1124292. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
This paper investigated the possibility of leaving out the traditional clean-up step in the QuEChERS procedure and analysing non-cleaned extracts from fruit, vegetables and cereals with a combination of gas chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (GC-MS/MS), back-flush technology and large-volume injection. By using calibration standards in cucumber matrix, recovery and precision were calculated in lettuce, orange and wheat for 109 pesticides at 0.01 and 0.1 mg kg(-1) in two sets of samples: one with and one without clean-up. For both spiking levels, 80-82% of the pesticides in the non-cleaned extracts and 80-84% of the pesticides in the cleaned extracts were within the acceptable recovery range of 70-120%. Precision data for both levels showed that 95% of the pesticides in the non-cleaned extracts and 93-95% of the pesticides in the cleaned extracts had RSDs below 20%. Recovery and precision data were determined using a two tailed t-test (p = 0.05). By using calibration standards in the respective matrix, we studied if the non-cleaned calibration standards gave an extra matrix effect compared with the cleaned standards by using the slope from calibration graphs and plotting the calculated extra matrix effect minus 100 for each compound. The results showed that for 79% of the pesticides, the extra matrix effect minus 100 was within the acceptable range of -20% to 20%. Five European Union proficiency tests on rye, mandarin, rice, pear and barley, respectively, from 2010 to 2012 were reanalysed omitting the clean-up step and showed satisfactory results. At least 70 injections of non-cleaned extracts were made without detecting any increased need for maintenance during the experimental period. Analysing non-cleaned QuEChERS extracts of lettuce, orange and wheat are possible under the conditions described in this paper because recovery, precision and specificity showed satisfactory results compared with samples subjected to traditional dispersive clean-up.
本文研究了在QuEChERS方法中省略传统净化步骤的可能性,并采用气相色谱-串联质谱法(GC-MS/MS)、反吹技术和大体积进样相结合的方式分析水果、蔬菜和谷物未经净化的提取物。通过使用黄瓜基质中的校准标准品,在两组样品中,分别于0.01和0.1 mg kg⁻¹水平下,计算了生菜、橙子和小麦中109种农药的回收率和精密度:一组进行净化,另一组不进行净化。对于两个加标水平,未经净化提取物中80 - 82%的农药以及经净化提取物中80 - 84%的农药回收率在70 - 120%的可接受范围内。两个水平的精密度数据表明,未经净化提取物中95%的农药以及经净化提取物中93 - 95%的农药相对标准偏差(RSD)低于20%。使用双侧t检验(p = 0.05)确定回收率和精密度数据。通过使用各自基质中的校准标准品,我们利用校准曲线的斜率并绘制每种化合物计算出的额外基质效应减去100,研究了未经净化的校准标准品与经净化的标准品相比是否产生额外的基质效应。结果表明,79%的农药其额外基质效应减去100在 - 20%至20%的可接受范围内。分别对2010年至2012年来自欧盟的五项黑麦、柑橘、大米、梨和大麦能力验证样品重新进行分析,省略净化步骤,结果令人满意。在实验期间,至少对未经净化的提取物进行了70次进样,未检测到任何维护需求增加的情况。在本文所述条件下,分析生菜、橙子和小麦未经净化的QuEChERS提取物是可行的,因为与经过传统分散净化的样品相比,回收率、精密度和特异性均显示出令人满意的结果。