Suppr超能文献

正颌外科的虚拟咬合定义

Virtual occlusal definition for orthognathic surgery.

作者信息

Liu X J, Li Q Q, Zhang Z, Li T T, Xie Z, Zhang Y

机构信息

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Peking University School and Hospital of Stomatology, Beijing, China.

Tshing Hua University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;45(3):406-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.07.022. Epub 2015 Dec 14.

Abstract

Computer-assisted surgical simulation is being used increasingly in orthognathic surgery. However, occlusal definition is still undertaken using model surgery with subsequent digitization via surface scanning or cone beam computed tomography. A software tool has been developed and a workflow set up in order to achieve a virtual occlusal definition. The results of a validation study carried out on 60 models of normal occlusion are presented. Inter- and intra-user correlation tests were used to investigate the reproducibility of the manual setting point procedure. The errors between the virtually set positions (test) and the digitized manually set positions (gold standard) were compared. The consistency in virtual set positions performed by three individual users was investigated by one way analysis of variance test. Inter- and intra-observer correlation coefficients for manual setting points were all greater than 0.95. Overall, the median error between the test and the gold standard positions was 1.06mm. Errors did not differ among teeth (F=0.371, P>0.05). The errors were not significantly different from 1mm (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in the errors made by the three independent users (P>0.05). In conclusion, this workflow for virtual occlusal definition was found to be reliable and accurate.

摘要

计算机辅助手术模拟在正颌外科中的应用越来越广泛。然而,咬合关系的确定仍需通过模型外科手术,随后通过表面扫描或锥形束计算机断层扫描进行数字化处理。为了实现虚拟咬合关系的确定,已开发了一种软件工具并建立了工作流程。本文展示了对60个正常咬合模型进行的验证研究结果。采用用户间和用户内相关性测试来研究手动设定点程序的可重复性。比较了虚拟设定位置(测试)与数字化手动设定位置(金标准)之间的误差。通过单因素方差分析测试研究了三位个体用户在虚拟设定位置上的一致性。手动设定点的观察者间和观察者内相关系数均大于0.95。总体而言,测试位置与金标准位置之间的中位数误差为1.06mm。各牙齿之间的误差无差异(F = 0.371,P>0.05)。误差与1mm无显著差异(P>0.05)。三位独立用户所产生的误差无显著差异(P>0.05)。总之,这种虚拟咬合关系确定的工作流程被发现是可靠且准确

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验