Lachenmeier Dirk W, Plato Leander, Suessmann Manuela, Di Carmine Matthew, Krueger Bjoern, Kukuck Armin, Kranz Markus
Chemisches und Veterinäruntersuchungsamt (CVUA) Karlsruhe, Weissenburger Strasse 3, 76187 Karlsruhe, Germany.
Lab Synergy, 374 Pulaski Highway, Goshen, NY 10924 USA.
Springerplus. 2015 Dec 18;4:783. doi: 10.1186/s40064-015-1574-6. eCollection 2015.
The determination of the alcoholic strength in spirits and liqueurs is required to control the labelling of alcoholic beverages. The reference methodology prescribes a distillation step followed by densimetric measurement. The classic distillation using a Vigreux rectifying column and a West condenser is time consuming and error-prone, especially for liqueurs that may have problems with entrainment and charring. For this reason, this methodology suggests the use of an automated steam distillation device as alternative. The novel instrument comprises an increased steam power, a redesigned geometry of the condenser and a larger cooling coil with controllable flow, compared to previously available devices. Method optimization applying D-optimal and central composite designs showed significant influence of sample volume, distillation time and coolant flow, while other investigated parameters such as steam power, receiver volume, or the use of pipettes or flasks for sample measurement did not significantly influence the results. The method validation was conducted using the following settings: steam power 70 %, sample volume 25 mL transferred using pipettes, receiver volume 50 mL, coolant flow 7 L/min, and distillation time as long as possible just below the calibration mark. For four different liqueurs covering the typical range of these products between 15 and 35 % vol, the method showed an adequate precision, with relative standard deviations below 0.4 % (intraday) and below 0.6 % (interday). The absolute standard deviations were between 0.06 % vol and 0.08 % vol (intraday) and between 0.07 % vol and 0.10 % vol (interday). The improved automatic steam distillation devices offer an excellent alternative for sample cleanup of volatiles from complex matrices. A major advantage are the low costs for consumables per analysis (only distilled water is needed). For alcoholic strength determination, the method has become more rugged than before, and there are only few influences that would lead to incomplete distillation. Our validation parameters have shown that the performance of the method corresponds to the data presented for the reference method and we believe that automated steam distillation, can be used for the purpose of labelling control of alcoholic beverages.
测定烈酒和利口酒中的酒精含量对于控制酒精饮料的标签至关重要。参考方法规定了一个蒸馏步骤,随后进行密度测量。使用维格列精馏柱和韦斯特冷凝器的经典蒸馏方法耗时且容易出错,尤其是对于可能存在夹带和烧焦问题的利口酒。因此,该方法建议使用自动蒸汽蒸馏装置作为替代方法。与以前的装置相比,这种新型仪器具有更高的蒸汽功率、重新设计的冷凝器几何形状以及更大的冷却盘管且流量可控。应用D - 最优设计和中心复合设计进行方法优化表明,样品体积、蒸馏时间和冷却剂流量有显著影响,而其他研究参数,如蒸汽功率、接收器体积或用于样品测量的移液管或烧瓶的使用,对结果没有显著影响。方法验证采用以下设置:蒸汽功率70%,使用移液管转移的样品体积25 mL,接收器体积50 mL,冷却剂流量7 L/min,蒸馏时间尽可能长且刚好低于校准标记。对于四种不同的利口酒,涵盖了这些产品15% vol至35% vol的典型范围,该方法显示出足够的精密度,日内相对标准偏差低于0.4%,日间相对标准偏差低于0.6%。绝对标准偏差在日内为0.06% vol至0.08% vol之间,日间为0.07% vol至0.10% vol之间。改进后的自动蒸汽蒸馏装置为从复杂基质中净化挥发性物质提供了极好的替代方法。一个主要优点是每次分析的耗材成本低(仅需蒸馏水)。对于酒精含量的测定,该方法比以前更加耐用,几乎没有会导致蒸馏不完全的影响因素。我们的验证参数表明,该方法的性能与参考方法给出的数据相符,并且我们认为自动蒸汽蒸馏可用于酒精饮料标签控制的目的。