Mittal S R
Department of Cardiology, Mittal Hospital & Research Centre, Pushkar Road, Ajmer 305001, Rajasthan, India.
Indian Heart J. 2015 Nov-Dec;67(6):552-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ihj.2015.08.008. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
Definite clinical diagnosis of microvascular angina is not possible with the existing knowledge. Resting electrocardiogram may be normal, and exercise electrocardiogram may be unremarkable. Echocardiography usually does not show regional wall motion abnormalities. Transthoracic Doppler echocardiography can satisfactorily evaluate only left anterior descending coronary artery and that too in some patients. Radio-isotope imaging can detect only severe localized disease. Noninvasive diagnosis needs high index of suspicion. At present, definite diagnosis is based on documentation of normal epicardial coronaries, coronary flow reserve less than 2.5 on adenosine induced hyperemia, and absence of spasm of epicardial coronaries on acetylcholine provocation. Invasive evaluation is costly, needs sophisticated equipments and expertise. Therapeutic and prognostic implications of various parameters remains to be evaluated. At present invasive evaluation is recommended only for patients with intractable symptoms with unconfirmed diagnosis, requiring repeated hospitalization and evaluation with failure of empirical therapy.
根据现有知识,无法对微血管性心绞痛进行明确的临床诊断。静息心电图可能正常,运动心电图可能无异常表现。超声心动图通常不会显示节段性室壁运动异常。经胸多普勒超声心动图仅能对部分患者的左前降支冠状动脉进行满意评估。放射性核素成像仅能检测到严重的局限性病变。无创诊断需要高度的怀疑指数。目前,明确诊断基于以下几点:心外膜冠状动脉正常、腺苷诱发充血时冠状动脉血流储备小于2.5以及乙酰胆碱激发试验时心外膜冠状动脉无痉挛。有创评估成本高,需要精密设备和专业技术。各种参数的治疗和预后意义仍有待评估。目前,仅建议对诊断未确诊、症状顽固、需要反复住院且经验性治疗失败的患者进行有创评估。