van Dijk C Niek, Longo Umile Giuseppe, Loppini Mattia, Florio Pino, Maltese Ludovica, Ciuffreda Mauro, Denaro Vincenzo
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128, Trigoria, Rome, Italy.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Apr;24(4):1200-16. doi: 10.1007/s00167-015-3942-8. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
The aim of the present study was to perform a systematic review of the current classification systems, and the clinical and radiological tests for the acute isolated syndesmotic injuries to identify the best method of classification and diagnosis allowing the surgeon to choose the appropriate management.
A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines has been performed. A comprehensive search using various combinations of the keywords "classification", "grading system", "ankle injury", "ligament", "syndesmotic injury", "internal fixation", "acute", "synostosis", "ligamentoplasties", "clinical", "radiological" over the years 1962-2015 was performed. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE, Google Scholar, EMBASE and Ovid.
The literature search resulted in 345 references for classification systems and 308 references for diagnosis methods, of which 283 and 295 were rejected due to off-topic abstract and/or failure to fulfil the inclusion criteria. After reading the remaining full-text articles, we included 27 articles describing classification systems and 13 articles describing diagnostic tests for acute isolated syndesmotic injuries.
The ESSKA-AFAS consensus panel recommends distinguishing acute isolated syndesmotic injury as stable or unstable. Stable injuries should be treated non-operatively with a short-leg cast or brace, while unstable injuries should be managed operatively. The recommended clinical tests include: tenderness on palpation over the anterior tibiofibular ligament, the fibular translation test and the Cotton test. Radiographic imaging must include an AP view and a mortise view of the syndesmosis to check the tibiofibular clear space, medial clear space overlap, tibial width and fibular width.
IV.
本研究旨在对当前急性单纯下胫腓联合损伤的分类系统以及临床和影像学检查进行系统评价,以确定最佳的分类和诊断方法,从而使外科医生能够选择合适的治疗方案。
根据PRISMA指南对文献进行系统评价。使用“分类”“分级系统”“踝关节损伤”“韧带”“下胫腓联合损伤”“内固定”“急性”“骨桥形成”“韧带成形术”“临床”“影像学”等关键词的各种组合,对1962年至2015年期间的文献进行全面检索。检索了以下数据库:MEDLINE、谷歌学术、EMBASE和Ovid。
文献检索得到345篇关于分类系统的参考文献和308篇关于诊断方法的参考文献,其中283篇和295篇因摘要与主题无关和/或未满足纳入标准而被排除。阅读其余全文后,我们纳入了27篇描述分类系统的文章和13篇描述急性单纯下胫腓联合损伤诊断检查的文章。
欧洲运动医学学会-美国足踝外科协会共识小组建议将急性单纯下胫腓联合损伤区分为稳定或不稳定型。稳定型损伤应采用短腿石膏或支具进行非手术治疗,而不稳定型损伤应进行手术治疗。推荐的临床检查包括:胫腓前韧带触压痛、腓骨平移试验和科顿试验。影像学检查必须包括下胫腓联合的前后位片和斜位片,以检查胫腓间隙、内侧间隙重叠、胫骨宽度和腓骨宽度。
IV级。