Ding Kan, Gong Yunhua, Modur Pradeep N, Diaz-Arrastia Ramon, Agostini Mark, Gupta Puneet, McColl Roderick, Hays Ryan, Van Ness Paul
Department of Neurology and Neurotherapeutics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8508, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd, Dallas, TX 75390-8508, USA.
Epilepsy Res. 2016 Feb;120:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2015.11.018. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
The Wada test is widely used in the presurgical evaluation of potential temporal lobectomy patients to predict postoperative memory function. Expected asymmetry (EA), defined as Wada memory lateralized to the nonsurgical hemisphere, or a higher score after injection of the surgical hemisphere would be considered favorable in terms of postoperative memory outcome. However, in some cases, nonlateralized memory (NM) results, with no appreciable asymmetry, may occur because of impaired scores after both injections, often leading to denial of surgery. The reason for such nonlateralized Wada memory in patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) remains unclear. Given that quantitative morphometric magnetic resonance imaging studies in TLE patients have shown bilateral regional atrophy in temporal and extratemporal structures, we hypothesized that the volume loss in contralateral temporal structures could contribute to nonlateralized Wada memory performance. To investigate this, we examined the relationship between the volume changes of temporal structures and Wada memory scores in patients with intractable TLE with mesial temporal sclerosis (MTS) using an age- and gender-matched control group. Memory was considered nonlateralized if the absolute difference in the total correct recall scores between ipsilateral and contralateral injections was <11%. Among 21 patients, Wada memory was lateralized in 15 and nonlateralized in 6 patients, with all the nonlateralized scores being observed in left TLE. The recall scores after ipsilateral injection were significantly lower in patients with an NM profile than an EA profile (23 ± 14% vs. 59 ± 18% correct recall, p ≤ 0.001). However, the recall scores after contralateral injection were low but similar between the two groups (25 ± 17% vs. 25 ± 15% correct recall, p=0.97). Compared to controls, all the patients showed greater volume loss in the temporal regions. However, patients with a NM profile showed significantly more volume loss than those with a lateralized memory profile in both contralateral and ipsilateral temporal regions (p<0.05). Left hemispheric Wada memory performance correlated positively with the size of the left mesial and neocortical temporal structures (r=0.49-0.63, p=0.005-0.04). Our study suggests that volume loss in the nonsurgical temporal structures is associated with nonlateralized Wada memory results in patients with intractable TLE.
Wada测试广泛应用于潜在的颞叶切除术患者的术前评估,以预测术后记忆功能。预期不对称性(EA),定义为Wada记忆定位于非手术半球,或手术半球注射后得分更高,就术后记忆结果而言被认为是有利的。然而,在某些情况下,可能会出现无明显不对称性的非定侧记忆(NM)结果,这是由于两次注射后的得分受损,常常导致手术被拒绝。难治性颞叶癫痫(TLE)患者出现这种非定侧Wada记忆的原因仍不清楚。鉴于对TLE患者进行的定量形态学磁共振成像研究显示颞叶和颞外结构存在双侧区域萎缩,我们假设对侧颞叶结构的体积损失可能导致非定侧Wada记忆表现。为了对此进行研究,我们使用年龄和性别匹配的对照组,检查了患有内侧颞叶硬化(MTS)的难治性TLE患者颞叶结构的体积变化与Wada记忆得分之间的关系。如果同侧和对侧注射之间总正确回忆得分的绝对差异<11%,则记忆被认为是非定侧的。在21例患者中,15例Wada记忆定侧,6例非定侧,所有非定侧得分均出现在左侧TLE患者中。NM型患者同侧注射后的回忆得分显著低于EA型患者(正确回忆率分别为23±14%和59±18%,p≤0.001)。然而,对侧注射后的回忆得分较低,但两组之间相似(正确回忆率分别为25±17%和25±15%,p = 0.97)。与对照组相比,所有患者颞叶区域的体积损失更大。然而,NM型患者在对侧和同侧颞叶区域的体积损失均显著大于定侧记忆型患者(p<0.05)。左侧半球Wada记忆表现与左侧内侧和新皮质颞叶结构的大小呈正相关(r = 0.49 - 0.63,p = 0.005 - 0.04)。我们的研究表明,难治性TLE患者非手术颞叶结构的体积损失与非定侧Wada记忆结果相关。