Lenders T, Kuster J, Bispinck R
Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. 2015 Dec;83(12):695-701. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-109577. Epub 2015 Dec 29.
To develop an intervention concept for the management of uninhabitable homes.
Retrospective analysis of 186 cases of the community mental health service in Dortmund (Germany) presenting with a destitute situation of the domestic environment as core problem.
All patients suffered from psychiatric illnesses, mainly from addiction (F1: 41 %), psychosis (F2: 17 %), depression (F3: 17 %), and hoarding disorder (F63.8: 12 %). Main socio-demographic characteristics of our sample are: middle age (45-65 years, 48 %), male gender (73 %), isolated situation (only 7 % married, 84 % living alone), normal schooling (only 4 % without completion of schooling, 7 % attended a school for special needs), after initial integration into employment nearly all patients suffered vocational disintegration (5 % employed, 44 % unemployment benefit, 7 % welfare, 39 % pension or invalidity benefit).Psychosocial interventions differed between the 4 main diagnostic groups: F1: treatment of dependence (rehab) and treatment of concomitant somatic diseases; F2: admission to a psychiatric hospital and implementation of guardianship; F3: mediation of conflicts with neighbours/landlords and implementation of guardianship; F63.8: direct practical help by members of the community mental health team and organisation of home help/waste disposal. In all diagnostic groups, acceptance of help was impaired due to social withdrawal, resistance and psychiatric symptoms. At 13 %, compliance with help and interventions was lowest in the hoarder group (F1: 27 %, F2: 26 %, F3: 38 %). Consequently, in this group the poor outcome categories "nothing accomplished" and "lost flat/eviction" were more frequent (44 %, F1: 27 %, F2: 26 %, F3: 38 %).
Concurrent to the deterioration of the domestic situation, patients suffer vocational disintegration as well as family and social isolation. Uninhabitable homes occur in the course of various severe and chronic psychiatric diseases. They don't constitute a syndrome and they are not characteristic for one specific diagnosis. It is important to recognise the underlying psychiatric disease as diagnosis influences acceptance of help, choice of appropriate interventions, outcome and prognosis. Tab. 1 shows our suggestion for a diagnosis differentiated approach, relating appearance of the home and behaviour of the patient to diagnosis, appropriate interventions and prognosis. Hard to reach is the group of hoarders. Patients with a psychotic illness and with hoarding disorder require implementation of long-term outreach help in their homes.
制定一项针对不适宜居住房屋管理的干预方案。
对德国多特蒙德社区精神卫生服务中以家庭环境贫困为核心问题的186例病例进行回顾性分析。
所有患者均患有精神疾病,主要为成瘾症(F1:41%)、精神病(F2:17%)、抑郁症(F3:17%)和囤积障碍(F63.8:12%)。我们样本的主要社会人口学特征为:中年(45 - 65岁,48%)、男性(73%)、孤立状态(仅7%已婚,84%独居)、正常教育程度(仅4%未完成学业,7%就读于特殊需求学校),在初步融入就业后,几乎所有患者都经历了职业解体(5%就业,44%领取失业救济金,7%领取福利金,39%领取养老金或伤残抚恤金)。心理社会干预在4个主要诊断组之间存在差异:F1:依赖治疗(康复治疗)和并发躯体疾病的治疗;F2:入住精神病院并实施监护;F3:调解与邻居/房东的冲突并实施监护;F63.8:社区精神卫生团队成员提供直接实际帮助以及组织家政服务/垃圾处理。在所有诊断组中,由于社交退缩、抵触情绪和精神症状,帮助的接受度受到影响。囤积障碍组的帮助和干预依从性最低,为13%(F1:27%,F2:26%,F3:38%)。因此,在该组中,“毫无成效”和“失去住所/被驱逐”等不良结局类别更为常见(44%,F1:27%,F2:26%,F3:38%)。
随着家庭状况的恶化,患者同时经历职业解体以及家庭和社会孤立。不适宜居住的房屋出现在各种严重和慢性精神疾病的病程中。它们不构成一种综合征,也不是某一特定诊断的特征。重要的是识别潜在的精神疾病,因为诊断会影响帮助的接受度、适当干预措施的选择、结局和预后。表1展示了我们对于一种诊断差异化方法的建议,即将房屋外观和患者行为与诊断、适当干预措施和预后相关联。囤积障碍患者群体难以接触。患有精神病和囤积障碍的患者需要在其家中实施长期的外展帮助。