Suppr超能文献

保乳治疗对早期男性乳腺癌来说是一种安全的治疗方式吗?

Is Breast Conserving Therapy a Safe Modality for Early-Stage Male Breast Cancer?

作者信息

Zaenger David, Rabatic Bryan M, Dasher Byron, Mourad Waleed F

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA.

Department of Radiation Oncology, Georgia Regents University, Augusta, GA.

出版信息

Clin Breast Cancer. 2016 Apr;16(2):101-4. doi: 10.1016/j.clbc.2015.11.005. Epub 2015 Nov 17.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease and lacks data-based treatment guidelines. Most men are currently treated with modified radical mastectomy (MRM) or simple mastectomy (SM). We compared the oncologic treatment outcomes of early-stage MBC to determine whether breast conservation therapy (BCT) is appropriate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database for MBC cases. That cohort was narrowed to cases of stage I-II, T1-T2N0 MBC with surgical and radiation therapy (RT) data available. The patients had undergone MRM, SM, or breast conservation surgery (BCS) with or without postoperative RT. We calculated the actuarial 5-year cause-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

We identified 6263 MBC cases and included 1777 men with stage I or II, T1-T2, node-negative disease, who had the required treatment information available. MRM without RT was the most common treatment (43%). Only 17% underwent BCS. Of the BCS patients, 46% received adjuvant RT to complete the traditional BCT. No deaths were recorded in the BCT group, regardless of stage, or in the 3 stage I surgical groups if the men had received RT. The actuarial 5-year CSS was 100% in each BCT group. MRM alone resulted in an actuarial 5-year CSS of 97.3% for stage 1% and 91.2% for stage 2.

CONCLUSION

The results from our study suggest that BCT for early-stage MBC yields comparable survival compared with more invasive treatment modalities (ie, MRM or SM alone). This could shift the treatment paradigm to less-invasive interventions and might have the added benefit of increased functional and psychological outcomes. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm our conclusions.

摘要

引言

男性乳腺癌(MBC)是一种罕见疾病,缺乏基于数据的治疗指南。目前大多数男性接受改良根治性乳房切除术(MRM)或单纯乳房切除术(SM)。我们比较了早期MBC的肿瘤治疗结果,以确定保乳治疗(BCT)是否合适。

材料与方法

我们在监测、流行病学和最终结果数据库中搜索MBC病例。该队列被缩小到I-II期、T1-T2N0 MBC且有手术和放疗(RT)数据的病例。患者接受了MRM、SM或保乳手术(BCS),术后接受或未接受RT。我们计算了精算5年特定病因生存率(CSS)。

结果

我们识别出6263例MBC病例,纳入了1777例I期或II期、T1-T2、淋巴结阴性疾病且有可用治疗信息的男性。未接受RT的MRM是最常见的治疗方式(43%)。只有17%的患者接受了BCS。在接受BCS的患者中,46%接受了辅助RT以完成传统的BCT。无论分期如何,BCT组均未记录死亡病例;如果男性接受了RT,I期的3个手术组也未记录死亡病例。每个BCT组的精算5年CSS均为100%。单纯MRM导致I期的精算5年CSS为97.3%,II期为91.2%。

结论

我们的研究结果表明,早期MBC的BCT与侵入性更强的治疗方式(即单纯MRM或SM)相比,生存率相当。这可能会将治疗模式转向侵入性较小的干预措施,并且可能具有改善功能和心理结果的额外益处。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来证实我们的结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验