Zhen Juan, Antonio Tamara, Jacob Joanna C, Grandy David K, Reith Maarten E A, Dutta Aloke K, Selley Dana E
Department of Psychiatry, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA.
Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA.
Neurochem Res. 2016 Feb;41(1-2):328-339. doi: 10.1007/s11064-015-1808-6. Epub 2015 Dec 31.
In elucidating the role of pharmacodynamic efficacy at D3 receptors in therapeutic effectiveness of dopamine receptor agonists, the influence of study system must be understood. Here two compounds with D3 over D2 selectivity developed in our earlier work, D-264 and D-301, are compared in dopamine receptor-mediated G-protein activation in striatal regions of wild-type and D2 receptor knockout mice and in CHO cells expressing D2 or D3 receptors. In caudate-putamen of D2 knockout mice, D-301 was ~3-fold more efficacious than D-264 in activating G-proteins as assessed by [(35)S]GTPγS binding; in nucleus accumbens, D-301 stimulated G-protein activation whereas D-264 did not. In contrast, the two ligands exerted similar efficacy in both regions of wild-type mice, suggesting both ligands activate D2 receptors with similar efficacy. In D2 and D3 receptor-expressing CHO cells, D-264 and D-301 appeared to act in the [(35)S]GTPγS assay as full agonists because they produced maximal stimulation equal to dopamine. Competition for [(3)H]spiperone binding was then performed to determine Ki/EC50 ratios as an index of receptor reserve for each ligand. Action of D-301, but not D-264, showed receptor reserve in D3 but not in D2 receptor-expressing cells, whereas dopamine showed receptor reserve in both cell lines. Gαo1 is highly expressed in brain and is important in D2-like receptor-G protein coupling. Transfection of Gαo1 in D3- but not D2-expressing CHO cells led to receptor reserve for D-264 without altering receptor expression levels. D-301 and dopamine exhibited receptor reserve in D3-expressing cells both with and without transfection of Gαo1. Altogether, these results indicate that D-301 has greater intrinsic efficacy to activate D3 receptors than D-264, whereas the two compounds act on D2 receptors with similar intrinsic efficacy. These findings also suggest caution in interpreting Emax values from functional assays in receptor-transfected cell models without accounting for receptor reserve.
在阐明D3受体的药效学效能在多巴胺受体激动剂治疗效果中的作用时,必须了解研究系统的影响。在此,我们比较了在早期工作中开发的两种对D3的选择性高于D2的化合物D-264和D-301,它们在野生型和D2受体敲除小鼠的纹状体区域以及表达D2或D3受体的CHO细胞中对多巴胺受体介导的G蛋白激活的影响。在D2敲除小鼠的尾状核-壳核中,通过[(35)S]GTPγS结合评估,D-301激活G蛋白的效能比D-264高约3倍;在伏隔核中,D-301刺激G蛋白激活,而D-264则无此作用。相反,在野生型小鼠的两个区域中,这两种配体表现出相似的效能,表明这两种配体以相似的效能激活D2受体。在表达D2和D3受体的CHO细胞中,D-264和D-301在[(35)S]GTPγS试验中似乎作为完全激动剂起作用,因为它们产生的最大刺激与多巴胺相当。然后进行[(3)H]螺哌隆结合竞争试验,以确定Ki/EC50比值,作为每种配体受体储备的指标。D-301的作用(而非D-264的作用)在表达D3但不表达D2受体的细胞中显示出受体储备,而多巴胺在两种细胞系中均显示出受体储备。Gαo1在脑中高度表达,在D2样受体-G蛋白偶联中起重要作用。在表达D3而非D2的CHO细胞中转染Gαo1导致D-264出现受体储备,而不改变受体表达水平。无论是否转染Gαo1,D-301和多巴胺在表达D3的细胞中均表现出受体储备。总之,这些结果表明,D-301激活D3受体的内在效能比D-264大,而这两种化合物对D2受体的内在效能相似。这些发现还表明,在受体转染细胞模型中解释功能试验的Emax值时,如果不考虑受体储备,需谨慎。