Taylor Duncan, Abarno Damien, Hicks Tacha, Champod Christophe
Forensic Science South Australia, 21 Divett Place, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100 Adelaide SA, Australia 5001.
Forensic Science South Australia, 21 Divett Place, Adelaide, SA 5000, Australia; School of Biological Sciences, Flinders University, GPO Box 2100 Adelaide SA, Australia 5001.
Forensic Sci Int Genet. 2016 Mar;21:54-67. doi: 10.1016/j.fsigen.2015.11.009. Epub 2015 Nov 28.
The evaluation of forensic evidence can occur at any level within the hierarchy of propositions depending on the question being asked and the amount and type of information that is taken into account within the evaluation. Commonly DNA evidence is reported given propositions that deal with the sub-source level in the hierarchy, which deals only with the possibility that a nominated individual is a source of DNA in a trace (or contributor to the DNA in the case of a mixed DNA trace). We explore the use of information obtained from examinations, presumptive and discriminating tests for body fluids, DNA concentrations and some case circumstances within a Bayesian network in order to provide assistance to the Courts that have to consider propositions at source level. We use a scenario in which the presence of blood is of interest as an exemplar and consider how DNA profiling results and the potential for laboratory error can be taken into account. We finish with examples of how the results of these reports could be presented in court using either numerical values or verbal descriptions of the results.
根据所提出的问题以及评估过程中所考虑的信息数量和类型,法医证据的评估可以在命题层次结构的任何级别进行。通常,DNA证据的报告所依据的命题涉及层次结构中的子源级别,该级别仅处理指定个体是微量DNA来源(或在混合DNA微量样本情况下是DNA贡献者)的可能性。我们探索如何在贝叶斯网络中利用从检验、体液的推定和鉴别测试、DNA浓度以及一些案件情况中获得的信息,以便为必须考虑源级别命题的法院提供帮助。我们以一个血液存在情况受关注的场景为例,考虑如何将DNA分析结果和实验室误差可能性纳入其中。最后,我们给出示例,说明这些报告的结果如何使用数值或结果的文字描述在法庭上呈现。