Eranti Antti, Aro Aapo L, Kerola Tuomas, Tikkanen Jani T, Rissanen Harri A, Anttonen Olli, Junttila M Juhani, Knekt Paul, Huikuri Heikki V
Department of Internal Medicine, Päijät-Häme Central Hospital, Lahti, Finland.
Division of Cardiology, Heart and Lung Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 1;117(3):388-93. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.10.057. Epub 2015 Nov 18.
Evidence of the role of body mass index (BMI) as a risk factor for sudden cardiac death (SCD) is conflicting, and how electrocardiographic (ECG) SCD risk markers perform in subjects with different BMIs is not known. In this study, a general population cohort consisting of 10,543 middle-aged subjects (mean age 44 years, 52.7% men) was divided into groups of lean (BMI <20, n = 374), normal weight (BMI 20.0 to 24.9, n = 4,334), overweight (BMI 25.0 to 29.9, n = 4,390), and obese (BMI >30, n = 1,445) subjects. Cox proportional hazards models adjusted for confounders were used to assess the risk for SCD associated with BMI and the risk for SCD associated with ECG abnormalities in subjects with different BMIs. The overweight and obese subjects were at increased risk for SCD (hazard ratios [95% CIs] were 1.33 [1.13 to 1.56], p = 0.001 and 1.79 [1.44 to 2.23], p <0.001 for overweight and obese subjects, respectively). The risk of non-SCD had a similar relation with BMI as SCD. Hazard ratios associated with ECG abnormalities were 3.03, 1.75, 1.74, and 1.34 in groups of lean, normal weight, overweight, and obese subjects, respectively, but no statistical significance was reached in the obese. ECG abnormalities improved integrated discrimination indexes and continuous net reclassification indexes statistically significantly only in the normal weight group. In conclusion, the overweight and obese are at increased risk for SCD but also for non-SCD, and ECG abnormalities are associated with increased risk of SCD also in normal weight subjects presenting with less traditional cardiovascular risk factors.
体重指数(BMI)作为心源性猝死(SCD)风险因素的作用证据存在矛盾,且不同BMI受试者中心电图(ECG)SCD风险标志物的表现尚不清楚。在本研究中,一个由10543名中年受试者(平均年龄44岁,男性占52.7%)组成的普通人群队列被分为消瘦(BMI<20,n = 374)、正常体重(BMI 20.0至24.9,n = 4334)、超重(BMI 25.0至29.9,n = 4390)和肥胖(BMI>30,n = 1445)组。使用针对混杂因素进行调整的Cox比例风险模型来评估不同BMI受试者中与BMI相关的SCD风险以及与ECG异常相关的SCD风险。超重和肥胖受试者发生SCD的风险增加(超重和肥胖受试者的风险比[95%置信区间]分别为1.33[1.13至1.56],p = 0.001和1.79[1.44至2.23],p<0.001)。非SCD风险与BMI的关系与SCD相似。消瘦、正常体重、超重和肥胖组中与ECG异常相关的风险比分别为3.03、1.75、1.74和1.34,但肥胖组未达到统计学显著性。ECG异常仅在正常体重组中显著改善了综合判别指数和连续净重新分类指数。总之,超重和肥胖者发生SCD的风险增加,但非SCD风险也增加,并且在具有较少传统心血管危险因素的正常体重受试者中,ECG异常也与SCD风险增加相关。