Jain Nishank, Li Xilong, Adams-Huet Beverley, Sarode Ravi, Toto Robert D, Banerjee Subhash, Hedayati S Susan
Department of Internal Medicine, Kidney Institute, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas.
Division of Biostatistics, Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas.
Am J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 15;117(4):656-663. doi: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2015.11.029. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
Thrombotic events while receiving antiplatelet agents (APAs) are more common in subjects with versus without chronic kidney disease (CKD). Data on antiplatelet effects of APA in CKD are scarce and limited by lack of baseline platelet function before APA treatment. We hypothesized subjects with stages 4 to 5 CKD versus no CKD have greater baseline platelet aggregability and respond poorly to aspirin and clopidogrel. In a prospective controlled study, we measured whole blood platelet aggregation (WBPA) in 28 CKD and 16 non-CKD asymptomatic stable outpatients not on APA, frequency-matched for age, gender, obesity, and diabetes mellitus. WBPA was remeasured after 2 weeks of each aspirin and aspirin plus clopidogrel. The primary outcome was percent inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) from baseline. The secondary outcome was residual platelet aggregability (RPA; proportion with <50% IPA). Baseline platelet aggregability was similar between groups except adenosine diphosphate-induced WBPA, which was higher in CKD versus non-CKD; median (interquartile range) = 13.5 (9.5 to 16.0) versus 9.0 (6.0 to 12.0) Ω, p = 0.007. CKD versus non-CKD participants had lower clopidogrel-induced IPA, 38% versus 72%, p = 0.04. A greater proportion of CKD versus non-CKD participants had RPA after clopidogrel treatment (56% vs 8.3%, p = 0.01). There were no significant interactions between CKD and the presence of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms for platelet aggregability in clopidogrel-treated participants. In conclusion, CKD versus non-CKD subjects exhibited similar platelet aggregation at baseline, similar aspirin effects and greater RPA on clopidogrel, which was independent of cytochrome P450 2C19 polymorphisms.
接受抗血小板药物(APA)治疗时,血栓形成事件在患有慢性肾脏病(CKD)的患者中比未患CKD的患者更常见。关于APA在CKD中的抗血小板作用的数据稀缺,且因缺乏APA治疗前的基线血小板功能而受到限制。我们假设4至5期CKD患者与无CKD患者相比,具有更高的基线血小板聚集性,并且对阿司匹林和氯吡格雷的反应较差。在一项前瞻性对照研究中,我们测量了28例CKD患者和16例未接受APA治疗的非CKD无症状稳定门诊患者的全血血小板聚集(WBPA)情况,这些患者在年龄、性别、肥胖和糖尿病方面进行了频率匹配。在给予阿司匹林以及阿司匹林加氯吡格雷治疗2周后,再次测量WBPA。主要结局是血小板聚集抑制率(IPA)相对于基线的百分比。次要结局是残余血小板聚集性(RPA;IPA<50%的比例)。除了二磷酸腺苷诱导的WBPA外,两组之间的基线血小板聚集性相似,CKD患者的该指标高于非CKD患者;中位数(四分位间距)分别为13.5(9.5至16.0)Ω和9.0(6.0至12.0)Ω,p = 0.007。CKD患者与非CKD患者相比,氯吡格雷诱导的IPA较低,分别为38%和72%,p = 0.04。氯吡格雷治疗后,CKD患者中具有RPA的比例高于非CKD患者(56%对8.3%,p = 0.01)。在接受氯吡格雷治疗的参与者中,CKD与细胞色素P450 2C19基因多态性的存在之间,在血小板聚集性方面没有显著相互作用。总之,CKD患者与非CKD患者在基线时表现出相似的血小板聚集,阿司匹林作用相似,但对氯吡格雷的RPA更高,这与细胞色素P450 2C19基因多态性无关。