Greene Laurence, Moreo Kathleen
PRIME Education, Inc. (PRIME®), USA.
BMJ Qual Improv Rep. 2015 May 20;4(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjquality.u208829.w3554. eCollection 2015.
Studies on inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have reported suboptimal approaches to patient care. In the United States, the findings have motivated leading gastroenterology organizations to call for initiatives that support clinicians in aligning their practices with quality measures for IBD and priorities of the National Quality Strategy (NQS). We designed and implemented a quality improvement (QI) education program on ulcerative colitis in which patient charts were audited for 30 gastroenterologists before (n = 300 charts) and after (n = 290 charts) they participated in QI-focused educational activities. Charts were audited for nine measures, selected for their alignment with four NQS priorities: making care safer, ensuring patient engagement, promoting communication, and promoting effective treatment practices. Four of the measures, including guideline-directed vaccinations and assessments of disease type and activity, were part of the CMS Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS). The other five measures involved counseling patients on various topics in ulcerative colitis management, documentation of side effects, assessment of adherence status, and simplification of dosing. The gastroenterologists also completed baseline and post-education surveys designed to assess qualitative outcomes. One of the educational interventions was a private audit feedback session conducted for each gastroenterologist. The sessions were designed to support participants in identifying measures reflecting suboptimal care quality and developing action plans for improvement. In continuous improvement cycles, follow-up interventions included QI tools and educational monographs. Across the nine chart variables, post-education improvements ranged from 0% to 48%, with a mean improvement of 15.9%. Survey findings revealed improvements in self-reported understanding of quality measures and intentions to apply them to practice, and lower rates of perceived significant barriers to high-quality care. The findings indicate the potential for QI education to support gastroenterologists in improving their performance on key measures of care quality for patients with ulcerative colitis.
关于炎症性肠病(IBD)的研究报告了患者护理方面存在的不理想方法。在美国,这些研究结果促使主要的胃肠病学组织呼吁采取举措,以支持临床医生使其实践符合IBD的质量标准和国家质量战略(NQS)的优先事项。我们设计并实施了一项关于溃疡性结肠炎的质量改进(QI)教育项目,在30名胃肠病学家参与以QI为重点的教育活动之前(n = 300份病历)和之后(n = 290份病历),对他们的患者病历进行审核。针对九项指标对病历进行审核,这些指标因其与NQS的四个优先事项相符而被选定:提高护理安全性、确保患者参与、促进沟通以及促进有效的治疗实践。其中四项指标,包括指南指导的疫苗接种以及疾病类型和活动的评估,是医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)医生质量报告系统(PQRS)的一部分。另外五项指标涉及就溃疡性结肠炎管理中的各种主题为患者提供咨询、记录副作用、评估依从性状况以及简化给药方案。胃肠病学家还完成了旨在评估定性结果的基线和教育后调查。教育干预措施之一是为每位胃肠病学家举办一次私人审核反馈会议。这些会议旨在帮助参与者识别反映护理质量欠佳的指标,并制定改进行动计划。在持续改进周期中,后续干预措施包括QI工具和教育专著。在这九个病历变量中,教育后的改进幅度从0%到48%不等,平均改进幅度为15.9%。调查结果显示,在自我报告的对质量标准的理解以及将其应用于实践的意愿方面有所改善,并且认为高质量护理存在重大障碍的比例有所降低。这些结果表明,QI教育有可能支持胃肠病学家在改善溃疡性结肠炎患者护理质量的关键指标方面的表现。