Sculco P K, Abdel M P, Hanssen A D, Lewallen D G
Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street S.W., Rochester, Minnesota, 55905, USA.
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jan;98-B(1 Suppl A):120-4. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B1.36345.
The treatment of bone loss in revision total knee arthroplasty has evolved over the past decade. While the management of small to moderate sized defects has demonstrated good results with a variety of traditional techniques (cement and screws, small metal augments, impaction bone grafting or modular stems), the treatment of severe defects continues to be problematic. The use of a structural allograft has declined in recent years due to an increased failure rate with long-term follow-up and with the introduction of highly porous metal augments that emphasise biological metaphyseal fixation. Recently published mid-term results on the use of tantalum cones in patients with severe bone loss has reaffirmed the success of this treatment strategy.
在过去十年中,翻修全膝关节置换术中骨丢失的治疗方法不断演变。虽然采用各种传统技术(骨水泥和螺钉、小型金属垫块、打压植骨或模块化柄)处理中小尺寸骨缺损已取得良好效果,但严重骨缺损的治疗仍然存在问题。近年来,由于长期随访失败率增加,以及强调生物学干骺端固定的高度多孔金属垫块的出现,结构性同种异体骨的使用有所减少。最近发表的关于在严重骨丢失患者中使用钽锥体的中期结果再次证实了这种治疗策略的成功。