Dahrouge Simone, Hogg William, Younger Jaime, Muggah Elizabeth, Russell Grant, Glazier Richard H
Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada Institute of Clinical Evaluative Sciences, Ottawa, Canada
Department of Family Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada C.T. Lamont Primary Health Care Research Centre, Bruyère Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada Institute of Population Health, University of Ottawa, Canada Department of Epidemiology and Community Medicine, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Ann Fam Med. 2016 Jan-Feb;14(1):26-33. doi: 10.1370/afm.1864.
The purpose of this study was to determine the relationship between the number of patients under a primary care physician's care (panel size) and primary care quality indicators.
We conducted a cross-sectional, population-based study of fee-for-service and capitated interprofessional and non-interprofessional primary health care practices in Ontario, Canada between April 2008 and March 2010, encompassing 4,195 physicians with panel sizes ≥1,200 serving 8.3 million patients. Data was extracted from multiple linked, health-related administrative databases and covered 16 quality indicators spanning 5 dimensions of care: access, continuity, comprehensiveness, and evidence-based indicators of cancer screening and chronic disease management.
The likelihood of being up-to-date on cervical, colorectal, and breast cancer screening showed relative decreases of 7.9% (P <.001), 5.9% (P = .01), and 4.6% (P <.001), respectively, with increasing panel size (from 1,200 to 3,900). Eight chronic care indicators (4 medication-based and 4 screening-based) showed no significant association with panel size. The likelihood of individuals with a new diagnosis of congestive heart failure having an echocardiogram, however, increased by a relative 8.1% (P <.001) with higher panel size. Increasing panel size was also associated with a 10.8% relative increase in hospitalization rates for ambulatory-care-sensitive conditions (P = .04) and a 10.8% decrease in non-urgent emergency department visits (P = .004). Continuity was highest with medium panel sizes (P <.001), and comprehensiveness had a small decrease (P = .03) with increasing panel size.
Increasing panel size was associated with small decreases in cancer screening, continuity, and comprehensiveness, but showed no consistent relationships with chronic disease management or access indicators. We found no panel size threshold above which quality of care suffered.
本研究旨在确定初级保健医生所照顾的患者数量(服务小组规模)与初级保健质量指标之间的关系。
我们于2008年4月至2010年3月在加拿大安大略省开展了一项基于人群的横断面研究,涉及按服务收费和按人头付费的跨专业和非跨专业初级卫生保健机构,涵盖4195名服务小组规模≥1200人的医生,他们为830万患者提供服务。数据从多个相互关联的、与健康相关的行政数据库中提取,涵盖16项质量指标,涉及护理的5个维度:可及性、连续性、全面性以及癌症筛查和慢性病管理的循证指标。
随着服务小组规模增加(从1200人增至3900人),宫颈癌、结直肠癌和乳腺癌筛查最新率的可能性分别相对降低了7.9%(P<.001)、5.9%(P =.01)和4.6%(P<.001)。八项慢性病指标(4项基于药物治疗,4项基于筛查)与服务小组规模无显著关联。然而,新诊断为充血性心力衰竭的患者进行超声心动图检查的可能性随着服务小组规模增大相对增加了8.1%(P<.001)。服务小组规模增大还与门诊护理敏感疾病住院率相对增加10.8%(P =.04)以及非紧急急诊科就诊次数减少10.8%(P =.004)相关。连续性在中等服务小组规模时最高(P<.001),全面性随着服务小组规模增大略有下降(P =.03)。
服务小组规模增大与癌症筛查、连续性和全面性的小幅下降相关,但与慢性病管理或可及性指标无一致关系。我们未发现存在一个服务小组规模阈值,超过该阈值护理质量就会下降。