Zamani Majid, Masoumi Babak, Esmailian Mehrdad, Habibi Amin, Khazaei Mehdi, Mohammadi Esfahani Mohammad
Department of Emergency Medicine, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Education Development Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, IR Iran.
Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2015 Dec 12;17(12):e20302. doi: 10.5812/ircmj.20302. eCollection 2015 Dec.
Focused assessment with sonography in trauma (FAST) is a method for prompt detection of the abdominal free fluid in patients with abdominal trauma.
This study was conducted to compare the diagnostic accuracy of FAST performed by emergency medicine residents (EMR) and radiology residents (RRs) in detecting peritoneal free fluids.
Patients triaged in the emergency department with blunt abdominal trauma, high energy trauma, and multiple traumas underwent a FAST examination by EMRs and RRs with the same techniques to obtain the standard views. Ultrasound findings for free fluid in peritoneal cavity for each patient (positive/negative) were compared with the results of computed tomography, operative exploration, or observation as the final outcome.
A total of 138 patients were included in the final analysis. Good diagnostic agreement was noted between the results of FAST scans performed by EMRs and RRs (κ = 0.701, P < 0.001), also between the results of EMRs-performed FAST and the final outcome (κ = 0.830, P < 0.0010), and finally between the results of RRs-performed FAST and final outcome (κ = 0.795, P < 0.001). No significant differences were noted between EMRs- and RRs-performed FASTs regarding sensitivity (84.6% vs 84.6%), specificity (98.4% vs 97.6%), positive predictive value (84.6% vs 84.6%), and negative predictive value (98.4% vs 98.4%).
Trained EMRs like their fellow RRs have the ability to perform FAST scan with high diagnostic value in patients with blunt abdominal trauma.
创伤重点超声评估(FAST)是一种用于快速检测腹部创伤患者腹腔游离液体的方法。
本研究旨在比较急诊科住院医师(EMR)和放射科住院医师(RR)进行FAST检查检测腹腔游离液体的诊断准确性。
在急诊科接受分诊的钝性腹部创伤、高能创伤和多发伤患者,由EMR和RR采用相同技术进行FAST检查以获取标准图像。将每位患者腹腔游离液体的超声检查结果(阳性/阴性)与计算机断层扫描、手术探查或观察结果作为最终结局进行比较。
共有138例患者纳入最终分析。EMR和RR进行的FAST扫描结果之间具有良好的诊断一致性(κ = 0.701,P < 0.001),EMR进行的FAST结果与最终结局之间也具有良好的诊断一致性(κ = 0.830,P < 0.0010),最后RR进行的FAST结果与最终结局之间也具有良好的诊断一致性(κ = 0.795,P < 0.001)。在敏感性(84.6%对84.6%)、特异性(98.4%对97.6%)、阳性预测值(84.6%对84.6%)和阴性预测值(98.4%对98.4%)方面,EMR和RR进行的FAST检查未发现显著差异。
经过培训的EMR与RR一样,有能力对钝性腹部创伤患者进行具有高诊断价值的FAST扫描。