Suppr超能文献

作为痴呆症的一项检查,内克尔立方体临摹可能并不合适:来自田尻项目的重新分析。

Necker cube copying may not be appropriate as an examination of dementia: reanalysis from the Tajiri Project.

作者信息

Oonuma Jiro, Kasai Mari, Meguro Mitsue, Akanuma Kyoko, Yamaguchi Satoshi, Meguro Kenichi

机构信息

Division of Geriatric Behavioral Neurology, CYRIC, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.

出版信息

Psychogeriatrics. 2016 Sep;16(5):298-304. doi: 10.1111/psyg.12161. Epub 2016 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Necker cube is usually used for evaluating the visuoconstructional ability of patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and dementia. However, the Necker cube is often considered a drawing with a visual illusionary perspective. The purpose of this study was to investigate whether Necker cube copying could detect participants with MCI due to dementia.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed the database of the 1998 prevalence study that was part of the Tajiri Project (n = 599). Pencil drawings of the Necker cube on A4-sized white paper by non-demented people (Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR) 0 and 0.5, n = 256) were classified into two patterns: non-three-dimension (3-D) and 3-D. Two neuropsychologists assessed Necker cube copying according to the criteria of the classification. After the classification, the database of the 2003 incidence study was used according to the subjects' conversion to dementia.

RESULTS

In the prevalence study, among those who made a non-3-D drawing of the Necker cube, there were significantly fewer people in the CDR 0 group than in the CDR 0.5 and CDR 1+ groups; similarly, there were significantly fewer people in the CDR 0.5 group than in the CDR 1 + group (χ(2) = 32.6, P < 0.001; post-hoc tests using χ(2) tests, CDR 0 > CDR 0.5 > CDR 1+, P < 0.001). In the incidence study, among those who made a non-3-D drawing of the Necker cube, there were significantly fewer people in the non-converter group than in the converter group (χ(2) = 19.9, P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference between the non-converter group (n = 21) and the converter group (n = 21) when age, sex, educational levels, and Mini-Mental State Examination scores were controlled (χ(2) = 0.0, P = 1.000).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggested that Necker cube copying may evaluate visual illusion as well as visuoconstructional ability. The Necker cube may not be an appropriate test to detect participants with MCI due to dementia.

摘要

背景

内克尔立方体通常用于评估轻度认知障碍(MCI)和痴呆患者的视觉构建能力。然而,内克尔立方体常被认为是一幅具有视觉错觉透视的图画。本研究的目的是调查临摹内克尔立方体是否能检测出患有痴呆症的MCI参与者。

方法

我们回顾性分析了作为田尻项目一部分的1998年患病率研究的数据库(n = 599)。非痴呆患者(临床痴呆评定量表(CDR)为0和0.5,n = 256)在A4尺寸白纸上用铅笔绘制的内克尔立方体图画被分为两种模式:非三维(3-D)和三维。两名神经心理学家根据分类标准评估内克尔立方体临摹情况。分类后,根据受试者向痴呆症的转化情况使用2003年发病率研究的数据库。

结果

在患病率研究中,在内克尔立方体绘制为非三维的人群中,CDR 0组的人数显著少于CDR 0.5组和CDR 1+组;同样,CDR 0.5组的人数显著少于CDR 1 +组(χ(2)= 32.6,P < 0.001;使用χ(2)检验的事后检验,CDR 0 > CDR 0.5 > CDR 1+,P < 0.001)。在发病率研究中,在内克尔立方体绘制为非三维的人群中,未转化组的人数显著少于转化组(χ(2)= 19.9,P < 0.001)。然而,在控制年龄、性别、教育水平和简易精神状态检查得分后,未转化组(n = 21)和转化组(n = 21)之间没有显著差异(χ(2)= 0.0,P = 1.000)。

结论

我们的结果表明,临摹内克尔立方体可能既能评估视觉错觉,也能评估视觉构建能力。内克尔立方体可能不是检测患有痴呆症的MCI参与者的合适测试。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验