McClellan Sean R, Panattoni Laura, Chan Albert S, Tai-Seale Ming
*Abt Associates, Cambridge, MA †Qualis Health, Seattle, WA ‡Sutter Health, Emeryville, CA §Palo Alto Medical Foundation Research Institute, Palo Alto, CA.
Med Care. 2016 Mar;54(3):287-95. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000483.
Few studies have examined the association between patient-initiated electronic messaging (e-messaging) and clinical outcomes in fee-for-service settings.
To estimate the association between patient-initiated e-messages and quality of care among patients with diabetes and hypertension.
Longitudinal observational study from 2009 to 2013. In March 2011, the medical group eliminated a $60/year patient user fee for e-messaging and established a provider payment of $3-5 per patient-initiated e-message. Quality of care for patients initiating e-messages was compared before and after March 2011, relative to nonmessaging patients. Propensity score weighting accounted for differences between e-messaging and nonmessaging patients in generalized estimating equations.
Large multispecialty practice in California compensating providers' fee-for-service.
Patients with diabetes (N=4232) or hypertension (N=15,463) who had activated their online portal but not e-messaged before e-messaging became free.
Quality of care included HEDIS-based process measures for hemoglobin (Hb) A1c, blood pressure, low-density lipoprotein (LDL), nephropathy, and retinopathy tests, and outcome measures for HbA1c, blood pressure, and LDL. E-messaging was measured as counts of patient-initiated e-message threads sent to providers. Patients were categorized into quartiles by e-messaging frequency.
The probability of annually completing indicated tests increased by 1%-7% for e-messaging patients, depending on the outcome and e-messaging frequency. E-messaging was associated with small improvements in HbA1c and LDL for some patients with diabetes.
Patient-initiated e-messaging may increase the likelihood of completing recommended tests, but may not be sufficient to improve clinical outcomes for most patients with diabetes or hypertension without additional interventions.
在按服务收费的环境中,很少有研究探讨患者发起的电子信息传递(电子信息)与临床结局之间的关联。
评估糖尿病和高血压患者中患者发起的电子信息与医疗质量之间的关联。
2009年至2013年的纵向观察性研究。2011年3月,该医疗集团取消了每年60美元的患者电子信息使用费用,并为每条患者发起的电子信息向提供者支付3至5美元。将2011年3月前后发起电子信息的患者的医疗质量与未发送电子信息的患者进行比较。倾向得分加权在广义估计方程中考虑了电子信息发送者与非电子信息发送者之间的差异。
加利福尼亚州的大型多专科医疗机构,按服务收费补偿提供者。
在电子信息免费之前激活了在线门户但未发送过电子信息的糖尿病患者(N = 4232)或高血压患者(N = 15463)。
医疗质量包括基于医疗效果数据和信息集(HEDIS)的血红蛋白(Hb)A1c、血压、低密度脂蛋白(LDL)、肾病和视网膜病变检测的过程指标,以及HbA1c、血压和LDL的结局指标。电子信息以发送给提供者的患者发起的电子信息线程计数来衡量。患者按电子信息发送频率分为四分位数。
根据结局和电子信息发送频率,电子信息发送患者每年完成指定检测的概率增加了1%至7%。对于一些糖尿病患者,电子信息与HbA1c和LDL的小幅改善有关。
患者发起的电子信息可能会增加完成推荐检测的可能性,但在没有额外干预的情况下,可能不足以改善大多数糖尿病或高血压患者的临床结局。