Ku Su Kyung, Jeong Ji Yun, Park Jong Dae, Jeon Ki Hong, Kim Eun Mi, Kim Young Boong
Division of Convergence Technology, Processing Technology Research Group, Korea Food Research Institute, Sungnam 463-746, Korea.
Korean J Food Sci Anim Resour. 2014;34(5):597-603. doi: 10.5851/kosfa.2014.34.5.597. Epub 2014 Oct 31.
In this study, the physicochemical and sensory quality characteristics due to the influence of various thawing methods on electro-magnetic and air blast frozen pork were examined. The packaged pork samples, which were frozen by air blast freezing at -45℃ or electro-magnetic freezing at -55℃, were thawed using 4 different methods: refrigeration (4±1℃), room temperature (RT, 25℃), cold water (15℃), and microwave (2450 MHz). Analyses were carried out to determine the drip and cooking loss, water holding capacity (WHC), moisture content and sensory evaluation. Frozen pork thawed in a microwave indicated relatively less thawing loss (0.63-1.24%) than the other thawing methods (0.68-1.38%). The cooking loss after electro-magnetic freezing indicated 37.4% by microwave thawing, compared with 32.9% by refrigeration, 36.5% by RT, and 37.2% by cold water in ham. The thawing of samples frozen by electro-magnetic freezing showed no significant differences between the methods used, while the moisture content was higher in belly thawed by microwave (62.0%) after electro-magnetic freezing than refrigeration (54.8%), RT (61.3%), and cold water (61.1%). The highest overall acceptability was shown for microwave thawing after electro-magnetic freezing but there were no significant differences compared to that of the other samples.
在本研究中,考察了各种解冻方法对电磁冷冻和鼓风冷冻猪肉理化及感官品质特性的影响。将在-45℃下鼓风冷冻或在-55℃下电磁冷冻的包装猪肉样品,采用4种不同方法解冻:冷藏(4±1℃)、室温(RT,25℃)、冷水(15℃)和微波(2450MHz)。进行分析以确定滴水损失和烹饪损失、持水能力(WHC)、水分含量和感官评价。与其他解冻方法(0.68-1.38%)相比,用微波解冻的冷冻猪肉解冻损失相对较少(0.63-1.24%)。电磁冷冻后的烹饪损失,在火腿中,微波解冻为37.4%,冷藏解冻为32.9%,室温解冻为36.5%,冷水解冻为37.2%。电磁冷冻样品的解冻在所用方法之间没有显著差异,而电磁冷冻后,腹部用微波解冻的水分含量(62.0%)高于冷藏(54.8%)、室温(61.3%)和冷水(61.1%)解冻的情况。电磁冷冻后微波解冻的总体可接受性最高,但与其他样品相比没有显著差异。