Quon Peter, Le Hoa H, Raymond Vincent, Mtibaa Mondher, Moshyk Andriy
a Evidera , Bethesda , MD , USA ;
b Evidera , Lexington , MA , USA ;
J Med Econ. 2016 Jun;19(6):557-67. doi: 10.3111/13696998.2016.1141780. Epub 2016 Feb 3.
Background and objective Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is associated with long-term clinical and economic burden. Clinical guidelines generally recommend at least 3 months of anticoagulation, but, in clinical practice, concerns over bleeding risk often limit extended treatment. Apixaban was studied for extended VTE treatment in the AMPLIFY-EXT trial, demonstrating superiority to placebo in VTE reduction without increasing risk of major bleeding. This study assessed the long-term clinical and economic benefits of extending treatment with apixaban when clinical equipoise exists compared to standard of care with enoxaparin/warfarin and other novel oral anti-coagulants (NOACs) for the treatment and prevention of recurrent VTE in Canada. Methods A Markov model was developed to follow patients with VTE over their lifetimes. Efficacy and safety for apixaban and enoxaparin/warfarin were based on AMPLIFY and AMPLIFY-EXT, while relative efficacy to other NOACs was synthesized by network meta-analysis (NMA). Dosages for NOACs and enoxaparin/warfarin were based on their respective trials and were given up to 18 months and up to 6 months, followed by no treatment, respectively. Patient quality adjusted life years (QALYs) were based on published studies, and costs for resource utilization were from a Ministry of Health perspective, expressed as 2014 CAD ($). Results Extended treatment with apixaban compared to enoxaparin/warfarin resulted in fewer recurrent VTEs, VTE-related deaths, and bleeding events, but at slightly increased cost. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $4828 per QALY gained. Compared to other NOACs, apixaban had the fewest bleeding events, similar recurrent VTE events, and the lowest overall cost, which was driven by the strong bleeding profile. In scenario analyses of acute and lifetime treatments, apixaban was cost-effective against all strategies. Conclusions Extended treatment with apixaban can offer substantial clinical benefits and is a cost-effective alternative to enoxaparin/warfarin and other NOACs.
背景与目的 静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)会带来长期的临床和经济负担。临床指南通常建议至少进行3个月的抗凝治疗,但在临床实践中,对出血风险的担忧常常限制了延长治疗。在AMPLIFY-EXT试验中对阿哌沙班用于VTE延长治疗进行了研究,结果表明其在降低VTE方面优于安慰剂,且未增加大出血风险。本研究评估了在加拿大,当存在临床 equipoise 时,与依诺肝素/华法林及其他新型口服抗凝药(NOACs)的标准治疗方案相比,使用阿哌沙班延长治疗复发性VTE的长期临床和经济效益。方法 建立了一个马尔可夫模型来跟踪VTE患者的一生。阿哌沙班和依诺肝素/华法林的疗效和安全性基于AMPLIFY和AMPLIFY-EXT试验,而与其他NOACs的相对疗效则通过网络荟萃分析(NMA)综合得出。NOACs和依诺肝素/华法林的剂量基于各自的试验,分别给予长达18个月和长达6个月的治疗,之后不再治疗。患者质量调整生命年(QALYs)基于已发表的研究,资源利用成本从卫生部的角度计算,以2014年加元($)表示。结果 与依诺肝素/华法林相比,使用阿哌沙班延长治疗导致复发性VTE、VTE相关死亡和出血事件更少,但成本略有增加。每获得一个QALY的增量成本效益比为4828加元。与其他NOACs相比,阿哌沙班的出血事件最少,复发性VTE事件相似,总体成本最低,这是由其良好的出血特征驱动的。在急性和终身治疗的情景分析中,阿哌沙班相对于所有策略均具有成本效益。结论 阿哌沙班延长治疗可带来显著的临床益处,是依诺肝素/华法林和其他NOACs的具有成本效益的替代方案。