Yoon Jean, Chow Adam, Rubenstein Lisa V
*Health Economics Resource Center †Center for Innovation to Implementation, VA Palo Alto, Menlo Park ‡Center for the Study of Healthcare Innovation, Implementation, & Policy, Greater Los Angeles VA, Sepulveda §UCLA School of Medicine, Los Angeles ∥RAND Corp., Santa Monica, CA.
Med Care. 2016 Feb;54(2):118-25. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000000478.
Evidence-based quality improvement (EBQI) methods may facilitate practice redesign for more effective implementation of the patient-centered medical home (PCMH).
We assessed changes in health care utilization and costs for patients receiving care from practices using an EBQI approach to implement PCMH and comparison practices over a 5-year period.
We used longitudinal, electronic data from patients in 6 practices using EBQI and 28 comparison practices implementing standard PCMH for 1 year before and 4 years after PCMH implementation. We analyzed trends in utilization and costs using bivariate analyses and independent effects of EBQI status on outcomes using multivariate regressions adjusting for year, patient and clinic factors, and patient random effects for repeated measures.
A total of 136,856 patients using Veterans Affairs primary care.
Veterans Affairs ambulatory care encounters, emergency department visits, admissions, and total health care costs per patient.
After PCMH implementation, overall utilization for primary care, specialty care, and mental health/substance abuse care decreased, whereas utilization for telephone care increased among all practices. Patients also had fewer hospitalizations and lower costs per patient. In adjusted analyses, EBQI practice was independently associated with fewer primary care (IRR=0.85), specialty care (IRR=0.83), and mental health care encounters (IRR=0.69); these effects attenuated over time (all P<0.01). There was no independent effect of EBQI on prescription drug use, acute care, health care costs, or mortality rate relative to comparison practices.
EBQI methods enhanced the effects of PCMH implementation by reducing ambulatory care while increasing non-face-to-face care.
循证质量改进(EBQI)方法可能有助于重新设计医疗实践,以便更有效地实施以患者为中心的医疗之家(PCMH)。
我们评估了采用EBQI方法实施PCMH的医疗实践以及对照医疗实践的患者在5年期间医疗服务利用情况和成本的变化。
我们使用了来自6家采用EBQI的医疗实践和28家实施标准PCMH的对照医疗实践中患者的纵向电子数据,这些数据涵盖PCMH实施前1年和实施后4年。我们使用双变量分析来分析利用情况和成本的趋势,并使用多变量回归分析EBQI状态对结果的独立影响,该回归对年份、患者和诊所因素进行了调整,并对重复测量采用了患者随机效应。
共有136,856名使用退伍军人事务部初级医疗服务的患者。
退伍军人事务部的门诊就诊次数、急诊就诊次数、住院次数以及每位患者的总医疗费用。
实施PCMH后,所有医疗实践中,初级医疗、专科医疗以及心理健康/药物滥用护理的总体利用率均下降,而电话护理的利用率上升。患者的住院次数也减少,每位患者的成本降低。在调整分析中,EBQI医疗实践与较少次数的初级医疗(风险比[IRR]=0.85)、专科医疗(IRR=0.83)以及心理健康护理就诊次数(IRR=0.69)独立相关;这些影响随时间减弱(所有P<0.01)。相对于对照医疗实践,EBQI对处方药使用、急性护理、医疗成本或死亡率没有独立影响。
EBQI方法通过减少门诊护理同时增加非面对面护理,增强了PCMH实施的效果。