Ousey K, Kaye V, McCormick K, Stephenson J
Director Institute of Skin Integrity and Infection Prevention.
School of Human and Health Sciences, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield.
J Wound Care. 2016 Jan;25(1):5-6, 8-11. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2016.25.1.5.
To investigate whether nursing/care home staff regard pressure ulceration as a safeguarding issue; and to explore reporting mechanisms for pressure ulcers (PUs) in nursing/care homes.
Within one clinical commissioning group, 65 staff members from 50 homes completed a questionnaire assessing their experiences of avoidable and unavoidable PUs, grading systems, and systems in place for referral to safeguarding teams. Understanding of safeguarding was assessed in depth by interviews with 11 staff members.
Staff observed an average of 2.72 PUs in their workplaces over the previous 12 months, judging 45.6% to be avoidable. Only a minority of respondents reported knowledge of a grading system (mostly the EPUAP/NPUAP system). Most respondents would refer PUs to the safeguarding team: the existence of a grading system, or guidance, appeared to increase that likelihood. Safeguarding was considered a priority in most homes; interviewees were familiar with the term safeguarding, but some confusion over its meaning was apparent. Quality of written documentation and verbal communication received before residents returned from hospital was highlighted. However, respondents expressed concern over lack of information regarding skin integrity. Most staff had received education regarding ulcer prevention or wound management during training, but none reported post-registration training or formal education programmes; reliance was placed on advice of district nurses or tissue viability specialists.
Staff within nursing/care homes understand the fundamentals of managing skin integrity and the importance of reporting skin damage; however, national education programmes are needed to develop knowledge and skills to promote patient health-related quality of life, and to reduce the health-care costs of pressure damage. Further research to investigate understanding, knowledge and skills of nursing/care home staff concerning pressure ulcer development and safeguarding will become increasingly necessary, as levels of the older population who may require assisted living continue to rise.
调查护理院/养老院工作人员是否将压疮视为一个保障问题;并探索护理院/养老院中压疮的报告机制。
在一个临床委托小组内,来自50家机构的65名工作人员完成了一份问卷,评估他们对可避免和不可避免压疮的经历、分级系统以及转介至保障团队的现有系统。通过对11名工作人员的访谈深入评估他们对保障的理解。
工作人员在过去12个月里在其工作场所平均观察到2.72例压疮,认为其中45.6%是可避免的。只有少数受访者表示了解分级系统(大多是欧洲压疮咨询小组/美国国家压疮咨询小组系统)。大多数受访者会将压疮转介至保障团队:分级系统或指南的存在似乎增加了这种可能性。大多数机构将保障视为优先事项;受访者熟悉“保障”一词,但对其含义存在一些明显的困惑。强调了在居民出院返回前收到的书面文件和口头沟通的质量。然而,受访者对缺乏关于皮肤完整性的信息表示担忧。大多数工作人员在培训期间接受过预防溃疡或伤口管理的教育,但没有人报告有注册后培训或正规教育项目;依赖地区护士或组织活力专家的建议。
护理院/养老院的工作人员了解管理皮肤完整性的基本原理以及报告皮肤损伤的重要性;然而,需要国家教育项目来培养知识和技能,以提高与患者健康相关的生活质量,并降低压疮造成的医疗保健成本。随着可能需要辅助生活的老年人口数量持续上升,进一步研究调查护理院/养老院工作人员关于压疮发生和保障的理解、知识和技能将变得越来越必要。