Suppr超能文献

血培养阳性?住院内科患者血培养的指征及阳性率

Culture if spikes? Indications and yield of blood cultures in hospitalized medical patients.

作者信息

Linsenmeyer Katherine, Gupta Kalpana, Strymish Judith M, Dhanani Muhammad, Brecher Stephen M, Breu Anthony C

机构信息

Veterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, West Roxbury, Massachusetts.

Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts.

出版信息

J Hosp Med. 2016 May;11(5):336-40. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2541. Epub 2016 Jan 13.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although optimal utilization of blood cultures has been studied in populations, including emergency room and intensive care patients, less is known about the use of blood cultures in populations consisting exclusively of patients on a medical service.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the physician-selected indication and yield of blood cultures ordered after hospitalization to an acute medical service and to identify populations in which blood cultures may not be necessary.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective cohort study was performed at a single Veterans Affairs Medical Center from October 1, 2014 through April 15, 2015. Participants included all hospitalized patients on a medical service for whom a blood culture was ordered.

MEASUREMENTS

The main outcomes were the rate of true positive blood cultures and the predictors of true positive cultures.

RESULTS

The true positive rate was 3.6% per order. The most common physician-selected indications were fever and leukocytosis, neither of which alone was highly predictive of true positive blood cultures. The only indication significantly associated with a true positive blood culture was "follow-up previous positive" (likelihood ratio [LR]+ 3.4, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.8-6.5). The only clinical predictors were a working diagnosis of bacteremia/endocarditis (LR+ 3.7, 95% CI: 2.5-5.7) and absence of antibiotic exposure within 72 hours of the culture (LR+ 2.4, 95% CI: 1.2-4.9).

CONCLUSIONS

The rate of true positive blood cultures among patients on a medical service was lower than previously studied. Using objective and easily obtainable clinical characteristics, including antibiotic exposure and working diagnosis, may improve the likelihood of true positive blood cultures. Journal of Hospital Medicine 2016;11:336-340. © 2016 Society of Hospital Medicine.

摘要

背景

尽管已在包括急诊室和重症监护患者在内的人群中对血培养的最佳利用情况进行了研究,但对于仅由内科服务患者组成的人群中血培养的使用情况了解较少。

目的

确定住院后接受急性内科服务的患者中医生选择的血培养指征及阳性率,并确定可能无需进行血培养的人群。

设计、地点和患者:2014年10月1日至2015年4月15日在一家退伍军人事务医疗中心进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。参与者包括所有接受内科服务且接受了血培养的住院患者。

测量指标

主要结果为血培养真阳性率及真阳性培养的预测因素。

结果

每次医嘱的真阳性率为3.6%。医生选择的最常见指征为发热和白细胞增多,但单独一项都不能高度预测血培养真阳性。与血培养真阳性显著相关的唯一指征是“既往阳性结果的随访”(似然比[LR]+ 3.4,95%置信区间[CI]:1.8 - 6.5)。仅有的临床预测因素为菌血症/心内膜炎的初步诊断(LR+ 3.7,95% CI:2.5 - 5.7)以及培养前72小时内未使用抗生素(LR+ 2.4,95% CI:1.2 - 4.9)。

结论

内科服务患者中血培养真阳性率低于先前研究。利用客观且易于获得的临床特征,包括抗生素使用情况和初步诊断,可能会提高血培养真阳性的可能性。《医院医学杂志》2016年;11:336 - 340。© 2016医院医学协会。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验