Fromme V, Köhler C, Piesnack S, Oechtering G, Ludewig E
Vivian Fromme, Klinik für Kleintiere der Universität Leipzig, An den Tierkliniken 23, 04103 Leipzig, E-Mail:
Tierarztl Prax Ausg K Kleintiere Heimtiere. 2016;44(1):16-25. doi: 10.15654/TPK-150097. Epub 2016 Jan 14.
The aim of the study was to define anatomical characteristics of the feline salivary glands in cross-sectional images obtained by unenhanced computed tomography (CT) and to describe landmarks for a reliable identification.
Heads of adult normocephalic cats without indications of cephalic disease were examined. Cats were included in the prospective part of the study when examined no later than 1 hour post mortem (n = 16). In the retrospective part of the study, previous CT-studies were evaluated (n = 25). The results of both groups were evaluated separately. Initially, the possibility of identifying and delineating the salivary glands from the surrounding tissue was assessed. Anatomical structures of the head were then defined as landmarks. Dimensions and density (Hounsfield units, HU) of the salivary glands were determined based on transversal and reconstructed sagittal images.
In total, 94.3% of the parotid glands, 90.7% of the mandibular glands and 96.8% of the zygomatic glands could be delineated. The remaining salivary glands could not be identified. Anatomical landmarks, including the external ear canal, the musculus (M.) masseter, the M. pterygoideus medialis and the bulbus oculi facilitated the identification. Comparing the size of the salivary glands of both groups revealed differences (measured lateromedially and rostrocaudally) in size of ≤ 2 mm. The definable salivary glands varied significantly in their density. The mean density of the glandula (Gl.) parotis was 65 HU, of the Gl. mandibularis 62 HU and of the Gl. zygomatica 57 HU. The comparisons of densities of both sides of the glands did not show statistically significant differences.
The large salivary glands (Gl. parotis and Gl. mandibularis) and the Gl. zygomatica of the cat can be reliably identified in CT-images. CT landmarks and data regarding the size and density of each gland could be gathered. The remaining minor salivary glands could not be delineated accurately. The difference in depicting the glands can be explained mainly by a lack of contrast with the surrounding tissue.
本研究旨在明确未增强计算机断层扫描(CT)获取的横断面图像中猫唾液腺的解剖特征,并描述可靠识别的标志。
对无头部疾病迹象的成年标准头颅猫的头部进行检查。在死后不超过1小时进行检查的猫被纳入研究的前瞻性部分(n = 16)。在研究的回顾性部分,评估先前的CT研究(n = 25)。两组结果分别进行评估。首先,评估从周围组织中识别和勾勒唾液腺的可能性。然后将头部的解剖结构定义为标志。基于横断面和重建的矢状面图像确定唾液腺的尺寸和密度(亨氏单位,HU)。
总共94.3%的腮腺、90.7%的下颌下腺和96.8%的颧腺能够被勾勒出来。其余唾液腺无法识别。包括外耳道、咬肌、内侧翼内肌和眼球在内的解剖标志有助于识别。比较两组唾液腺的大小发现(在内外侧和前后方向测量)大小差异≤2毫米。可定义的唾液腺在密度上有显著差异。腮腺的平均密度为65 HU,下颌下腺为62 HU,颧腺为57 HU。腺体两侧密度的比较未显示出统计学上的显著差异。
在CT图像中可以可靠地识别猫的大唾液腺(腮腺和下颌下腺)以及颧腺。可以收集CT标志以及每个腺体大小和密度的数据。其余小唾液腺无法准确勾勒。描绘腺体的差异主要可以通过与周围组织缺乏对比度来解释。