Moghadam-Kia Siamak, Oddis Chester V, Aggarwal Rohit
Department of Medicine, Myositis Center and Division of Rheumatology and Clinical Immunology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 3601 5th Avenue, Suite 2B, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA.
Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2017 Feb;52(1):81-87. doi: 10.1007/s12016-016-8530-2.
Despite the lack of placebo-controlled trials, glucocorticoids are considered the mainstay of initial treatment for idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIMs) and myositis-associated ILD (MA-ILD). Glucocorticoid-sparing agents are often given concomitantly with other immunosuppressive agents, particularly in patients with moderate or severe disease. As treatment of refractory cases of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies has been challenging, there is growing interest in evaluating newer therapies including biologics that target various pathways involved in the pathogenesis of IIMs. In a large clinical trial of rituximab in adult and juvenile myositis, the primary outcome was not met, but the definition of improvement was met by most of this refractory group of myositis patients. Rituximab use was also associated with a significant glucocorticoid-sparing effect. Intravenous immune globulin (IVIg) can be used for refractory IIMs or those with severe dysphagia or concomitant infections. Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) utility in IIMs is generally limited by previous negative studies along with recent reports suggesting their potential for inducing myositis. Further research is required to assess the role of new therapies such as tocilizumab (anti-IL6), ACTH gel, sifalimumab (anti-IFNα), and abatacept (inhibition of T cell co-stimulation) given their biological plausibility and encouraging small case series results. Other potential novel therapies include alemtuzumab (a humanized monoclonal antibody which binds CD52 on B and T lymphocytes), fingolimod (a sphingosine 1-phosphate receptor modulator that traps T lymphocytes in the lymphoid organs), eculizumab, and basiliximab. The future investigations in IIMs will depend on well-designed controlled clinical trials using validated consensus core set measures and improvements in myositis classification schemes based on serologic and histopathologic features.
尽管缺乏安慰剂对照试验,但糖皮质激素仍被视为特发性炎性肌病(IIM)和肌炎相关间质性肺病(MA-ILD)初始治疗的主要手段。糖皮质激素节约剂常与其他免疫抑制剂联合使用,尤其是在中重度疾病患者中。由于特发性炎性肌病难治性病例的治疗一直具有挑战性,人们对评估包括针对IIM发病机制中各种途径的生物制剂在内的新疗法的兴趣日益浓厚。在一项关于利妥昔单抗治疗成人和青少年肌炎的大型临床试验中,主要结局未达成,但该难治性肌炎患者组中的大多数达到了改善的定义。使用利妥昔单抗还具有显著的糖皮质激素节约作用。静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIg)可用于难治性IIM或伴有严重吞咽困难或合并感染的患者。抗肿瘤坏死因子(抗TNF)在IIM中的应用通常受到先前阴性研究以及近期报告表明其有诱发肌炎可能性的限制。鉴于其生物学合理性和令人鼓舞的小病例系列结果,需要进一步研究来评估托珠单抗(抗IL6)、促肾上腺皮质激素凝胶、西法莫单抗(抗IFNα)和阿巴西普(抑制T细胞共刺激)等新疗法的作用。其他潜在的新型疗法包括阿仑单抗(一种结合B和T淋巴细胞上CD52的人源化单克隆抗体)、芬戈莫德(一种将T淋巴细胞捕获在淋巴器官中的鞘氨醇1-磷酸受体调节剂)、依库珠单抗和巴利昔单抗。IIM的未来研究将取决于使用经过验证的共识核心指标进行精心设计的对照临床试验,以及基于血清学和组织病理学特征的肌炎分类方案的改进。