Kaneshiro Takashi, Suzuki Hitoshi, Nodera Minoru, Yamada Shinya, Kamioka Masashi, Kamiyama Yoshiyuki, Takeishi Yasuchika
Department of Cardiology and Hematology, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Department of Arrhythmia and Cardiac Pacing, Fukushima Medical University, Fukushima, Japan.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;39(4):338-44. doi: 10.1111/pace.12810. Epub 2016 Feb 18.
In catheter ablation of idiopathic ventricular arrhythmia (VA), it is still unclear whether pace mapping or activation mapping is more useful for successful catheter ablation. The depth of origin in the ventricular wall especially affects the success rate of endocardial-approached catheter ablation. Thus, we examined the relationship between these tactics and QRS morphology.
We evaluated the relationship among pace mapping score, activation time, and peak deflection index (PDI) in 28 patients, with a total of 30 origins, who underwent successful catheter ablation of idiopathic VA.
All origins were located in the ventricular outflow tract area, including three in the left coronary cusp (LCC). PDI, activation time, and pace mapping score at successful ablation sites were 0.60 ± 0.08, 26.3 ± 9.9 ms, and 19.1 ± 4.6, respectively. The pace mapping score inversely correlated with the PDI (R = -0.540, P = 0.0017), but the activation time did not correlate with the PDI. When excluding the three VAs originating from the LCC, in which perfect pace mapping was obtained from epicardial sites despite high PDI, this correlation coefficient became more intensive (R = -0.734, P < 0.0001).
Our study suggests that pace mapping with an endocardial approach could not reproduce the precise QRS morphology for VA originating from the intramural site of the ventricular wall. With such origins, we should rely on activation mapping to detect the optimal ablation site.
在特发性室性心律失常(VA)的导管消融中,起搏标测或激动标测对于成功的导管消融哪个更有用仍不清楚。心室壁起源深度尤其影响心内膜途径导管消融的成功率。因此,我们研究了这些策略与QRS形态之间的关系。
我们评估了28例(共30个起源点)成功接受特发性VA导管消融患者的起搏标测评分、激动时间和峰值偏移指数(PDI)之间的关系。
所有起源点均位于心室流出道区域,包括左冠状动脉窦(LCC)中的3个。成功消融部位的PDI、激动时间和起搏标测评分分别为0.60±0.08、26.3±9.9毫秒和19.1±4.6。起搏标测评分与PDI呈负相关(R = -0.540,P = 0.0017),但激动时间与PDI不相关。当排除起源于LCC的3例VA时,尽管PDI较高,但从心外膜部位获得了完美的起搏标测,此时相关系数变得更强(R = -0.734,P < 0.0001)。
我们的研究表明,心内膜途径的起搏标测无法重现起源于心室壁壁内部位的VA的精确QRS形态。对于此类起源,我们应依靠激动标测来检测最佳消融部位。