Soulières Denis, Aguilar Jose Luis, Chen Eric, Misiukiewicz Krzysztof, Ernst Scott, Lee Hyun Jung, Bryant Katherine, He Shuang, Obasaju Coleman K, Chang Shao-Chun, Chin Steve, Adkins Douglas
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Mexico City, Mexico.
BMC Cancer. 2016 Jan 14;16:19. doi: 10.1186/s12885-016-2064-0.
Cetuximab, in combination with platinum chemotherapy plus 5-fluoruracil (5-FU), is approved for the first-line treatment of recurrent/metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). Cetuximab manufactured by ImClone (US commercial cetuximab) potentially results in higher systemic exposures than cetuximab manufactured by Boehringer Ingelheim (BI-manufactured cetuximab). This prospective, randomized, double-blind study compared the safety profiles of the two cetuximab formulations.
Patients with previously untreated locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN were randomly assigned to receive the same dose of US commercial cetuximab (Arm A) or BI-manufactured cetuximab (Arm B), each in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin plus 5-FU. The primary outcome was all-grade, all-cause treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs).
The majority of patients experienced ≥ 1 TEAE, regardless of causality (Arm A: 75/77 patients, 97.4%; Arm B: 68/71 patients, 95.8%). TEAEs with the highest incidence included nausea, fatigue, and hypomagnesemia in both arms. The absolute risk difference between the two arms for patients experiencing at least one adverse event (AE) was 0.029 (p = 0.281, 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.024, 0.082) for AEs regardless of causality and 0.005 (p = 0.915, 95% CI: -0.092, 0.103) for AEs possibly related to study drug. There were no significant differences between the two arms in the incidence of acneiform rash, cardiac events, infusion reactions, or hypomagnesemia. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and overall response rates were similar in the two arms.
There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety between US commercial cetuximab and BI-manufactured cetuximab in combination with platinum-based therapy with 5-FU in patients with locoregionally recurrent and/or metastatic SCCHN. The use of US commercial cetuximab in this combination chemotherapy regimen did not result in any unexpected safety signals. The efficacy results of this study are consistent with the efficacy results of the cetuximab arm of the EXTREME study.
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081041 ; date of registration: March 3, 2010).
西妥昔单抗联合铂类化疗加5-氟尿嘧啶(5-FU)被批准用于头颈部复发/转移性鳞状细胞癌(SCCHN)的一线治疗。英克隆公司生产的西妥昔单抗(美国上市的西妥昔单抗)可能比勃林格殷格翰公司生产的西妥昔单抗(BI生产的西妥昔单抗)导致更高的全身暴露量。这项前瞻性、随机、双盲研究比较了两种西妥昔单抗制剂的安全性。
先前未经治疗的局部区域复发和/或转移性SCCHN患者被随机分配接受相同剂量的美国上市西妥昔单抗(A组)或BI生产的西妥昔单抗(B组),每种均联合顺铂或卡铂加5-FU。主要结局是所有级别的、各种原因导致的治疗中出现的不良事件(TEAE)。
大多数患者经历了≥1次TEAE,无论其因果关系如何(A组:77例患者中的75例,97.4%;B组:71例患者中的68例,95.8%)。两组中发生率最高的TEAE包括恶心、疲劳和低镁血症。两组中至少经历一次不良事件(AE)的患者之间的绝对风险差异,对于任何因果关系的AE为0.029(p = 0.281,95%置信区间[CI]:-0.024,0.082),对于可能与研究药物相关的AE为0.005(p = 0.915,95%CI:-0.092,0.103)。两组在痤疮样皮疹、心脏事件、输液反应或低镁血症的发生率上无显著差异。两组的总生存期、无进展生存期和总缓解率相似。
在美国上市的西妥昔单抗和BI生产的西妥昔单抗与铂类联合5-FU治疗局部区域复发和/或转移性SCCHN患者时,安全性方面无临床意义上的差异。在这种联合化疗方案中使用美国上市的西妥昔单抗未产生任何意外的安全信号。本研究的疗效结果与EXTREME研究中西妥昔单抗组的疗效结果一致。
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01081041;注册日期:2010年3月3日。