Suppr超能文献

疑似冠状动脉疾病成像的最新趋势:最佳方法是什么?

Recent Trends in Imaging for Suspected Coronary Artery Disease: What Is the Best Approach?

作者信息

Levin David C, Parker Laurence, Halpern Ethan J, Rao Vijay M

机构信息

Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania; HealthHelp, Inc, Houston, Texas.

Center for Research on Utilization of Imaging Services, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

J Am Coll Radiol. 2016 Apr;13(4):381-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2015.11.015. Epub 2016 Jan 14.

Abstract

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to ascertain recent trends in noninvasive imaging utilization for suspected coronary artery disease.

METHODS

The Medicare Part B databases for 2001 to 2013 were reviewed. Current Procedural Terminology primary codes for radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI), stress echocardiography (SE), and coronary CT angiography (CCTA) were selected. Physician specialty codes were used to designate providers as radiologists, cardiologists, and all others as a group. Procedure volumes were tabulated, and utilization rates per 1,000 Medicare beneficiaries were calculated over the period of study.

RESULTS

Total MPI utilization rates per 1,000 rose rapidly from 63.4 in 2001 to a peak of 88.0 in 2006 but declined every year thereafter, dropping to 61.9 in 2013. SE rates generally held steady around 12 to 13 from 2001 to 2010 but then began to decline, reaching 10.8 in 2013. Cardiologists predominate in both MPI and SE. CCTA rates were far lower. They peaked at 2.1 in 2007, but then dropped before leveling off at 1.07 in both 2012 and 2013. Radiologists and cardiologists have approximately equal roles in this procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

Both MPI and SE seem to be declining in use in recent years. This is likely due to unfavorable reimbursement trends caused by code bundling and resulting in the closure of many private cardiology offices. CCTA use is far lower than the two other types of imaging and has also declined in recent years. This is puzzling, as it is a new and promising procedure that has some advantages over MPI and SE. In 2013, 58 times as many MPI studies as CCTA studies were performed.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定疑似冠状动脉疾病无创成像技术应用的近期趋势。

方法

回顾了2001年至2013年医疗保险B部分数据库。选择了放射性核素心肌灌注显像(MPI)、负荷超声心动图(SE)和冠状动脉CT血管造影(CCTA)的现行程序术语主要编码。使用医生专业代码将提供者指定为放射科医生、心脏病专家,其他所有人归为一组。统计了手术量,并计算了研究期间每1000名医疗保险受益人的使用率。

结果

每1000人的MPI总使用率从2001年的63.4迅速上升至2006年的峰值88.0,但此后每年下降,2013年降至61.9。2001年至2010年期间,SE使用率一般稳定在12至13左右,但随后开始下降,2013年降至10.8。在MPI和SE中,心脏病专家占主导地位。CCTA使用率要低得多。2007年达到峰值2.1,但随后下降,2012年和2013年稳定在1.07。放射科医生和心脏病专家在该手术中的作用大致相当。

结论

近年来,MPI和SE的使用似乎都在下降。这可能是由于编码捆绑导致报销趋势不利,致使许多私人心脏病诊所关闭。CCTA的使用远低于其他两种成像方式,且近年来也有所下降。这令人费解,因为它是一种新的、有前景的手术,比MPI和SE有一些优势。2013年,MPI检查的数量是CCTA检查的58倍。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验