Suppr超能文献

抗线粒体抗体阴性原发性胆汁性肝硬化的长期预后

Long-term outcomes in antimitochondrial antibody negative primary biliary cirrhosis.

作者信息

Juliusson Gunnar, Imam Mohamad, Björnsson Einar S, Talwalkar Jayant A, Lindor Keith D

机构信息

a Faculty of Medicine , University of Iceland , Reykjavík , Iceland ;

b Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology , Mayo Clinic , Rochester , MN , USA ;

出版信息

Scand J Gastroenterol. 2016;51(6):745-52. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2015.1132337. Epub 2016 Jan 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

Antimitochondrial antibodies (AMA) are a sensitive and specific marker for primary biliary cirrhosis (PBC). AMAs are present in 95% of patients with PBC. However, 5% do not have AMAs and data on these patients is scarce. We aim to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients with AMA negative PBC.

METHODS

A retrospective chart review of 71 AMA negative PBC patients. Disease presentation, laboratory results, and clinical endpoints were recorded. AMA negative patients were matched on year of diagnosis to a control group of 71 AMA positive patients.

RESULTS

Ninety-six percent of the AMA negative patients were of female gender with a median age at diagnosis of 55 years and a length of follow-up of 7.5 years vs. 86% females, a median age of 56 and a follow-up of 8.3 years in the control group. Mean total bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase levels were 0.7 mg/dL vs. 0.6 and 570 U/L vs 341, in AMA negative vs. AMA positive patients at presentation, respectively (p = NS). AMA negative patients did not differ in terms of age, serum IgM levels, ANA status, or length of follow-up. Notably, AMA negative patients had a significantly reduced survival free of liver-related complications including transplantation and death compared to AMA positive patients (p = 0.0182).

CONCLUSION

In this large experience, AMA negative PBC patients had a significantly worse prognosis compared to AMA positive PBC patients. The reason for the difference in prognosis is unclear, as it may be true difference or reflect delays in case detection among AMA negative patients.

摘要

目的

抗线粒体抗体(AMA)是原发性胆汁性肝硬化(PBC)的一种敏感且特异的标志物。95%的PBC患者存在AMA。然而,5%的患者没有AMA,且关于这些患者的数据很少。我们旨在评估AMA阴性PBC患者的长期预后。

方法

对71例AMA阴性PBC患者进行回顾性病历审查。记录疾病表现、实验室检查结果和临床终点。将AMA阴性患者按诊断年份与71例AMA阳性患者的对照组进行匹配。

结果

96%的AMA阴性患者为女性,诊断时的中位年龄为55岁,随访时间为7.5年;而对照组中86%为女性,中位年龄为56岁,随访时间为8.3年。AMA阴性患者与AMA阳性患者初诊时的平均总胆红素水平分别为0.7mg/dL和0.6mg/dL,碱性磷酸酶水平分别为570U/L和341U/L(p = 无显著性差异)。AMA阴性患者在年龄、血清IgM水平、ANA状态或随访时间方面无差异。值得注意的是,与AMA阳性患者相比,AMA阴性患者无肝相关并发症(包括移植和死亡)的生存率显著降低(p = 0.0182)。

结论

在这项大规模研究中,AMA阴性PBC患者的预后明显比AMA阳性PBC患者差。预后差异的原因尚不清楚,可能是真正的差异,也可能反映了AMA阴性患者在病例检测方面的延迟。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验