Colonio Salazar F B, Andiappan M, Radford D R, Gallagher J E
King's College London Dental Institute at Guy's, King's College and St Thomas' Hospitals, London, UK.
University of Portsmouth Dental Academy, Portsmouth, UK.
Eur J Dent Educ. 2017 May;21(2):91-100. doi: 10.1111/eje.12183. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
This study explored, and compared, the attitudes of student groups trained at the University of Portsmouth Dental Academy (UPDA) in 2010/2011 towards dental interprofessional education (IPE).
The study population consisted of fifth-year student dentists (n = 80) from King's College London Dental Institute, second- and third-year dental hygiene and therapy (n = 38) and first-year dental nursing (n = 14) students from UPDA. A 19-item, validated and dentally modified questionnaire, 'Readiness for Inter-Professional Learning Scale (RIPLS)', was administered. RIPLS contains three subscales: teamwork and collaboration, professional identity and roles and responsibilities. Mean (x¯) and standard deviation (SD) of the scores were calculated, following reversal of negative items. All the analyses were carried out using SPSS version 20 and STATA version 11.
An overall response rate of 71% (n = 94) was achieved. In reference to teamwork and collaboration, all groups strongly indicated that IPE can contribute to learning teamwork skills (x¯ = 24.98, SD = 3.5) and improving relationships with team members (x¯ = 12.93, SD = 1.63); however, the scores did not differ between the groups (P = 0.09 and P = 0.16, respectively). Concerning professional identity, student dentists had significantly higher preference for a discipline-based approach (P = 0.002); were more likely to agree that 'it is not necessary for undergraduate dental and dental care professional students to learn together' (P = 0.01); and perceived that 'clinical problem-solving skills can only be learnt effectively with other students from their own discipline' (P = 0.02) than dental hygiene and therapy students. In relation to roles and responsibilities, participants demonstrated a strong sense of their own professional role. Student dentists reported that they had 'to gain more knowledge and skills' than dental hygiene and therapy (P = 0.01) and dental nursing (P = 0.01) students. Dental hygiene and therapy students were less likely than student dentists to agree that 'the role of dental nurses and hygienists was to mainly provide support for dentists' (P = 0.001).
The findings suggest that IPE was perceived as beneficial in relation to teamwork; however, the study raises issues regarding professional identity and roles. Educators should consider differing perceptions of professional roles and identities when planning and delivering interprofessional programmes.
本研究探讨并比较了2010/2011年在朴茨茅斯大学牙科学院(UPDA)接受培训的学生群体对牙科跨专业教育(IPE)的态度。
研究对象包括来自伦敦国王学院牙科学院的五年级牙科学生(n = 80)、UPDA的二年级和三年级口腔卫生与治疗专业学生(n = 38)以及一年级牙科护理专业学生(n = 14)。采用了一份经过验证且针对牙科进行修改的包含19个条目的问卷“跨专业学习准备量表(RIPLS)”。RIPLS包含三个子量表:团队合作与协作、专业身份以及角色与职责。在对反向计分项目进行反转后,计算得分的均值(x¯)和标准差(SD)。所有分析均使用SPSS 20版本和STATA 11版本进行。
总体回复率为71%(n = 94)。关于团队合作与协作,所有组都强烈表示IPE有助于学习团队合作技能(x¯ = 24.98,SD = 3.5)以及改善与团队成员的关系(x¯ = 12.93,SD = 1.63);然而,各组之间的得分并无差异(分别为P = 0.09和P = 0.16)。关于专业身份,牙科学生对基于学科的方法有显著更高的偏好(P = 0.002);更有可能同意“牙科和牙科护理专业本科学生没有必要一起学习”(P = 0.01);并且认为“临床问题解决技能只能与来自本学科的其他学生有效学习”(P = 0.02),这一点比口腔卫生与治疗专业学生更为明显。在角色与职责方面,参与者对自己的专业角色有强烈的认知。牙科学生报告称他们比口腔卫生与治疗专业学生(P = 0.01)和牙科护理专业学生(P = 0.01)“需要获取更多的知识和技能”。口腔卫生与治疗专业学生比牙科学生更不太可能同意“牙科护士和口腔卫生师的主要角色是为牙医提供支持”(P = 0.001)。
研究结果表明,IPE在团队合作方面被认为是有益的;然而本研究提出了关于专业身份和角色的问题。教育工作者在规划和实施跨专业项目时应考虑对专业角色和身份的不同认知。