Soriano Arturo, Varona Aranzazu, Gianchandani Rajesh, Moneva Modesto Enrique, Arranz Javier, Gonzalez Antonio, Barrera Manuel
Arturo Soriano, Aranzazu Varona, Rajesh Gianchandani, Modesto Enrique Moneva, Javier Arranz, Antonio Gonzalez, Manuel Barrera, Liver Transplantation Unit, University Hospital Nuestra Señora de Candelaria, Santa Cruz, 38010 Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain.
World J Hepatol. 2016 Jan 8;8(1):58-68. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i1.58.
The aim of liver transplantation (LT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is to ensure a rate of disease-free survival similar to that of patients transplanted due to benign disease. Therefore, we are forced to adopt strict criteria when selecting candidates for LT and prioritizing patients on the waiting list (WL), to have clarified indications for bridging therapy for groups at risk for progression or recurrence, and to establish certain limits for downstaging therapies. Although the Milan criteria (MC) remain the standard and most employed criteria for indication of HCC patients for LT by far, in the coming years, criteria will be consolidated that take into account not only data regarding the size/volume and number of tumors but also their biology. This criteria will mainly include the alpha fetoprotein (AFP) values and, in view of their wide variability, any of the published logarithmic models for the selection of candidates for LT. Bridging therapy is necessary for HCC patients on the WL who meet the MC and have the possibility of experiencing a delay for LT greater than 6 mo or any of the known risk factors for recurrence. It is difficult to define single AFP values that would indicate bridging therapy (200, 300 or 400 ng/mL); therefore, it is preferable to rely on the criteria of a French AFP model score > 2. Other single indications for bridging therapy include a tumor diameter greater than 3 cm, more than one tumor, and having an AFP slope greater than 15 ng/mL per month or > 50 ng/mL for three months during strict monitoring while on the WL. When considering the inclusion of patients on the WL who do not meet the MC, it is mandatory to determine their eligibility for downstaging therapy prior to inclusion. The upper limit for this therapy could be one lesion up to 8 cm, 2-3 lesions with a total tumor diameter up to 8 cm, or a total tumor volume of 115 cm(3). Lastly, liver allocation and the prioritization of patients with HCC on the WL should take into account the recently described HCC model for end-stage liver disease, which considers hepatic function, HCC size and the number and the log of AFP values. This formula has been calibrated with the survival data of non-HCC patients and produces a dynamic and more accurate assessment model.
肝细胞癌(HCC)肝移植(LT)的目的是确保无病生存率与因良性疾病接受移植的患者相似。因此,我们在选择LT候选者和确定等待名单(WL)上患者的优先级时被迫采用严格标准,明确针对有进展或复发风险群体的桥接治疗指征,并为降期治疗设定一定限制。尽管米兰标准(MC)至今仍是HCC患者LT指征的标准且应用最广泛的标准,但在未来几年,将整合不仅考虑肿瘤大小/体积和数量数据,还考虑其生物学特性的标准。该标准将主要包括甲胎蛋白(AFP)值,鉴于其广泛变异性,还包括任何已发表的用于选择LT候选者的对数模型。对于符合MC且LT可能延迟超过6个月或有任何已知复发风险因素的WL上的HCC患者,桥接治疗是必要的。难以定义表明桥接治疗的单一AFP值(200、300或400 ng/mL);因此,最好依据法国AFP模型评分>2的标准。桥接治疗的其他单一指征包括肿瘤直径大于3 cm、多个肿瘤,以及在WL严格监测期间AFP斜率每月大于15 ng/mL或连续三个月大于50 ng/mL。在考虑纳入不符合MC的WL上的患者时,必须在纳入前确定其降期治疗的资格。该治疗的上限可以是单个直径达8 cm的病灶、2 - 3个总肿瘤直径达8 cm的病灶或总肿瘤体积115 cm³。最后,肝分配和WL上HCC患者的优先级应考虑最近描述 的终末期肝病HCC模型,该模型考虑肝功能、HCC大小、数量以及AFP值的对数。该公式已根据非HCC患者的生存数据进行校准,产生了一个动态且更准确的评估模型。