Suppr超能文献

人格解体-现实解体障碍中负启动需求下的认知负荷与自主反应模式

Cognitive load and autonomic response patterns under negative priming demand in depersonalization-derealization disorder.

作者信息

Lemche Erwin, Sierra-Siegert Mauricio, David Anthony S, Phillips Mary L, Gasston David, Williams Steven C R, Giampietro Vincent P

机构信息

Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College School of Medicine and Dentistry, Department of Psychosis Studies, Section of Cognitive Neuropsychiatry, Box PO69, Office 7.05, Basket 32, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, UK.

Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.

出版信息

Eur J Neurosci. 2016 Apr;43(7):971-8. doi: 10.1111/ejn.13183. Epub 2016 Feb 15.

Abstract

Previous studies have yielded evidence for cognitive processing abnormalities and alterations of autonomic functioning in depersonalization-derealization disorder (DPRD). However, multimodal neuroimaging and psychophysiology studies have not yet been conducted to test for functional and effective connectivity under cognitive stress in patients with DPRD. DPRD and non-referred control subjects underwent a combined Stroop/negative priming task, and the neural correlates of Stroop interference effect, negative priming effect, error rates, cognitive load span and average amplitude of skin conductance responses were ascertained for both groups. Evoked haemodynamic responses for basic Stroop/negative priming activations were compared. For basic Stroop to neutral contrast, patients with DPRD differed in the location (inferior vs. superior lobule) of the parietal region involved, but showed similar activations in the left frontal region. In addition, patients with DPRD also co-activated the dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (BA9) and posterior cingulate cortex (BA31), which were also found to be the main between-group difference regions. These regions furthermore showed connectivity with frequency of depersonalization states. Evoked haemodynamic responses drawn from regions of interest indicated significant between-group differences in 30-40% of time points. Brain-behaviour correlations differed mainly in laterality, yet only slightly in regions. A reversal of autonomic patterning became evident in patients with DPRD for cognitive load spans, indicating less effective arousal suppression under cognitive stress - patients with DPRD showed positive associations of cognitive load with autonomic responses, whereas controls exhibit respective inverse association. Overall, the results of the present study show only minor executive cognitive peculiarities, but further support the notion of abnormalities in autonomic functioning in patients with DPRD.

摘要

以往研究已得出有关人格解体-现实解体障碍(DPRD)认知加工异常及自主神经功能改变的证据。然而,尚未开展多模态神经影像学和心理生理学研究来检测DPRD患者在认知应激下的功能连接和有效连接。DPRD患者和非转诊对照受试者接受了一项结合了Stroop/负启动任务的实验,并确定了两组的Stroop干扰效应、负启动效应、错误率、认知负荷跨度和皮肤电反应平均振幅的神经关联。比较了基本Stroop/负启动激活的诱发血流动力学反应。对于基本Stroop与中性刺激的对比,DPRD患者所涉及的顶叶区域位置(下小叶与上小叶)不同,但在左侧额叶区域显示出相似的激活。此外,DPRD患者还共同激活了背内侧前额叶皮质(BA9)和后扣带回皮质(BA31),这些区域也是主要的组间差异区域。这些区域还显示出与人格解体状态频率的连接。从感兴趣区域得出的诱发血流动力学反应表明,在30%-40%的时间点上存在显著的组间差异。脑-行为相关性主要在偏侧性上有所不同,但在区域上差异较小。DPRD患者在认知负荷跨度方面自主神经模式出现逆转,表明在认知应激下唤醒抑制效果较差——DPRD患者的认知负荷与自主神经反应呈正相关,而对照组则呈现相反的关联。总体而言,本研究结果仅显示出轻微的执行认知特点,但进一步支持了DPRD患者存在自主神经功能异常的观点。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fb9/4855951/8b7c38865a6c/EJN-43-971-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验