Hesketh Ian
Institute for Advanced Studies in the Humanities, University of Queensland, Australia.
Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2016 Aug;58:41-8. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2015.12.015. Epub 2016 Jan 17.
This article examines a series of recent histories of science that have attempted to consider how science may have developed in slightly altered historical realities. These works have, moreover, been influenced by debates in evolutionary science about the opposing forces of contingency and convergence in regard to Stephen Jay Gould's notion of "replaying life's tape." The article argues that while the historians under analysis seem to embrace contingency in order to present their counterfactual narratives, for the sake of historical plausibility they are forced to accept a fairly weak role for contingency in shaping the development of science. It is therefore argued that Simon Conway Morris's theory of evolutionary convergence comes closer to describing the restrained counterfactual worlds imagined by these historians of science than does contingency.
本文考察了一系列近期的科学史著作,这些著作试图探讨在略有不同的历史现实中科学可能是如何发展的。此外,这些作品还受到了进化科学中关于偶然性和趋同性这两种对立力量的争论的影响,这一争论与斯蒂芬·杰伊·古尔德的“重放生命的录像带”这一概念有关。文章认为,虽然被分析的历史学家们似乎为了呈现他们的反事实叙述而接受偶然性,但为了历史的合理性,他们不得不接受偶然性在塑造科学发展过程中所起的作用相当微弱。因此,有人认为,西蒙·康威·莫里斯的进化趋同理论比偶然性更接近于描述这些科学史家所设想的有限的反事实世界。