Yang Yingchi, Wang Jin, Jin Lan, Zhao Xiaomu, Wu Guocong, Wang Kangli, Zhang Zhongtao
Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University; Beijing Key Laboratory of Cancer Invasion and Metastasis Research & National Clinical Research Center of Digestive Diseases, Beijing 100050, China.
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2016 Jan 1;54(1):25-9. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0529-5815.2016.01.007.
To verify the clinical safety of complete mesocolic excision (CME) and manufacture pathological large slices.
A prospective analysis clinical data of 85 right colon cancer in patients by the same group of surgeons at the Department of General Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University from January 2012 to December 2013 which were divided into two groups: CME group (n=39) and traditional radical operation group (n=46) by surgical approach. CME group and control group were compared the differences of clinic and pathologic variables, precise tissues morphometry, lymph nodes harvest, mesocolic area and so on. By comparison to operation time, blood loss, postoperative complications, flatus restoring time, drainage removal time and length of stay, the security of CME was analyzed. Statistical methods included independent sample t-test, Wilcoxon rank sum test and χ(2) test. In order to manufacture pathological large slices, the CME operation specimens were fixed. The large slices were stained by routine HE staining to detection of circumferential resection margin.
Mean number of total lymph nodes was increased obviously in CME group (26.8±1.9 vs. 23.2±3.4, t=4.261, P=0.000). Mean number of lymph nodes of stage Ⅰ, Ⅱ were different between two groups (25.8±3.6 vs. 18.2±4.5, 26.8±7.7 vs. 24.9±6.2, t=8.776, 2.802, P=0.000). The positive lymph nodes of CME group was higher than control group (4(7) vs. 1.5(2), P=0.032), above all with statistically significant difference. Comparing CME group with the control group, there were the larger area of mesentery ((15 555±1 263) mm(2) vs. (12 493±1 002) mm(2,) t=12.456, P=0.000), the greater distance between the tumor and the high vascular tie ((116±22) mm vs. (82±11) mm, t=9.295, P=0.000), the greater distance between the normal bowel and the high vascular tie ((92±17) mm vs. (74±10) mm, t=8.132, P=0.000) of CME, with statistically significant difference. There were no statistically significant differences from operation safety when CME group was compared with the control group. The pathological large slices of colon cancer were prepared successfully and dyed evenly than those large slices were used to observe whether the lymph tube and lymph node metastasis inside the mesocolon. Existence of direct tumor invasion could be confirmed by investigating the large slices. Cancer embolus in intravascular and micro infiltration in mesocolon also could be found.
CME operation can get the standard excision according the mesocolic area and integrity, as well as to harvest the maximum number of lymph node. The clinical application of CME is safe and does not increase the risk of operation. Circumferential resection margins can be detected by pathological large slices.
验证完整结肠系膜切除术(CME)的临床安全性并制作病理大切片。
对首都医科大学附属北京友谊医院普通外科同一组外科医生在2012年1月至2013年12月期间收治的85例右结肠癌患者的临床资料进行前瞻性分析,根据手术方式分为两组:CME组(n = 39)和传统根治手术组(n = 46)。比较CME组和对照组在临床和病理变量、精确组织形态测量、淋巴结清扫数量、结肠系膜面积等方面的差异。通过比较手术时间、出血量、术后并发症、排气恢复时间、引流管拔除时间和住院时间,分析CME的安全性。统计方法包括独立样本t检验、Wilcoxon秩和检验和χ²检验。为制作病理大切片,将CME手术标本固定。大切片进行常规HE染色以检测环周切缘。
CME组的总淋巴结平均数量明显增加(26.8±1.9对23.2±3.4,t = 4.261,P = 0.000)。Ⅰ、Ⅱ期的淋巴结平均数量在两组间存在差异(25.8±3.6对18.2±4.5,26.8±7.7对24.9±6.2,t = 8.776,2.802,P = 0.000)。CME组的阳性淋巴结高于对照组(4(7)对1.5(2),P = 0.032),总体差异有统计学意义。与对照组相比,CME组的系膜面积更大((15 555±1 263)mm²对(12 493±1 002)mm²,t = 12.456,P = 0.000),肿瘤与高位血管结扎处的距离更远((116±22)mm对(82±11)mm,t = 9.295,P = 0.000),正常肠管与高位血管结扎处的距离更远((92±17)mm对(74±10)mm,t = 8.132,P = 0.000),差异有统计学意义。CME组与对照组在手术安全性方面无统计学差异。成功制备了结肠癌的病理大切片,且染色比用于观察结肠系膜内淋巴管和淋巴结转移的大切片更均匀。通过研究大切片可确认肿瘤直接侵犯的存在。还可发现血管内癌栓和结肠系膜的微浸润。
CME手术可根据结肠系膜面积和完整性进行标准切除,同时能清扫最多数量的淋巴结。CME的临床应用是安全的,且不增加手术风险。病理大切片可检测环周切缘。