Hegazy Yasser Y, Rayan Amr, Sodian Ralf, Hassanein Wael, Ennker Jürgen
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr, Lahr, Germany Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt
Department of Cardiac Surgery, Heart Institute Lahr, Lahr, Germany Department of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Alexandria University, Alexandria, Egypt.
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2016 Apr;22(4):459-63; discussion 463-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivv388. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
End-stage renal disease patients on regular haemodialysis are at higher risk of calcification. Therefore, many surgeons have concerns regarding the implantation of bioprostheses in such patients. The haemodynamic advantages of stentless aortic bioprostheses support their use; however, these have not been studied yet in end-stage renal disease patients. We studied accordingly the early and mid-term outcomes of aortic valve replacement (AVR) using Medtronic Freestyle stentless aortic bioprostheses in this subset of patients in comparison with stented aortic bioprostheses.
We retrospectively studied two groups of consecutive patients on regular haemodialysis who required AVR between 2007 and 2013. Non-Freestyle (NFS) group received stented aortic bioprostheses (36 patients) and Freestyle (FS) group received Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprostheses (48 patients). Follow-up ranged from 2 to 76 months with a mean follow-up of 36.3 ± 25 months.
Patients in both groups showed similar demographic characters regarding age (76.4 ± 8.1 vs 74.9 ± 7.2 years; P = 0.35), male gender (58 vs 60%; P = 0.57) and diabetes mellitus (42 vs 48%; P = 0.57). Smaller aortic bioprostheses were implanted in the NFS (23.3 ± 1.2 vs 25.4 ± 2.1; P < 0.001) with consequently higher postoperative mean gradients (14.1 ± 4.1 vs 11.9 ± 5.3 mmHg; P = 0.004). No significant differences were noted regarding postoperative neurological disorder (8 vs 12%; P = 0.73), deep sternal wound infection (3 vs 4%; P = 0.68), re-exploration (8 vs 8%; P = 0.91) and in-hospital mortality (6 vs 4%; P = 0.92). Mid-term follow-up showed higher prosthetic valve calcification and/or sclerosis in NFS group (25 vs 6%; P = 0.015), whereas no significant differences were noticed between the two groups regarding stroke (0 vs 8%; P = 0.13), endocarditis (0 vs 4%; P = 0.50), 36- and 72-month survival (51 ± 2%, 14 ± 4% vs 55 ± 2%, 19 ± 3%, respectively; P = 0.45).
Aortic bioprostheses are a good option for haemodialysis patients requiring AVR, offering acceptable mid-term survival. The Medtronic Freestyle aortic bioprostheses could allow the implantation of larger bioprostheses inferring consequently lower mean gradients, with a potentially higher resistance to calcification and sclerosis in haemodialysis patients.
接受定期血液透析的终末期肾病患者发生钙化的风险更高。因此,许多外科医生对于在此类患者中植入生物假体存在顾虑。无支架主动脉生物假体的血流动力学优势支持其应用;然而,尚未在终末期肾病患者中对其进行研究。我们据此研究了在这一亚组患者中使用美敦力Freestyle无支架主动脉生物假体进行主动脉瓣置换(AVR)与有支架主动脉生物假体相比的早期和中期结果。
我们回顾性研究了2007年至2013年间两组需要进行AVR的接受定期血液透析的连续患者。非Freestyle(NFS)组接受有支架主动脉生物假体(36例患者),Freestyle(FS)组接受美敦力Freestyle主动脉生物假体(48例患者)。随访时间为2至76个月,平均随访时间为36.3±25个月。
两组患者在年龄(76.4±8.1岁对74.9±7.2岁;P = 0.35)、男性比例(58%对60%;P = 0.57)和糖尿病患病率(42%对48%;P = 0.57)方面显示出相似的人口统计学特征。NFS组植入的主动脉生物假体尺寸较小(23.3±1.2对25.4±2.1;P < 0.001),因此术后平均跨瓣压差较高(14.1±4.1对11.9±5.3 mmHg;P = 0.004)。术后神经系统疾病(8%对12%;P = 0.73)、深部胸骨伤口感染(3%对4%;P = 0.68)、再次手术探查(8%对8%;P = 0.91)和住院死亡率(6%对4%;P = 0.92)方面未观察到显著差异。中期随访显示NFS组人工瓣膜钙化和/或硬化发生率更高(25%对6%;P = 0.015),而两组在中风(0%对8%;P = 0.13)、心内膜炎(0%对4%;P = 0.50)、36个月和72个月生存率(分别为51±2%,14±4%对55±2%,19±3%;P = 0.45)方面未观察到显著差异。
主动脉生物假体对于需要进行AVR的血液透析患者是一个不错的选择,可提供可接受的中期生存率。美敦力Freestyle主动脉生物假体能够植入更大尺寸的生物假体,从而降低平均跨瓣压差,对于血液透析患者可能具有更高的抗钙化和抗硬化能力。