Second Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Department of Pediatrics, Instituto Nacional de Enfermedades Neoplásicas, Lima, Peru.
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Mar;17(3):332-344. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00520-3. Epub 2016 Jan 19.
Palonosetron has shown efficacy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in adults undergoing moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy. We assessed the efficacy and safety of palonosetron versus ondansetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients.
In this multicentre, multinational, double-blind, double-dummy, phase 3 study, paediatric patients aged between 0 and younger than 17 years, who were naive or non-naive to chemotherapy, and scheduled to undergo moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy for the treatment of malignant disease were randomised centrally (1:1:1) to receive up to four cycles of 10 μg/kg or 20 μg/kg palonosetron on day 1, or three 150 μg/kg doses of ondansetron on day 1, scheduled 4 h apart, according to a static central permuted block randomisation scheme by an interactive web response system. Randomisation was stratified according to age and emetogenicity. Treatment allocation was masked to project team members involved in data collection and analysis, and members of the investigator's team. The primary endpoint was complete response (no vomiting, retching, or use of rescue drugs) during the acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle, as assessed in the population of randomly assigned patients who received moderately or highly emetogenic chemotherapy and an active study drug. The primary efficacy objective was to show the non-inferiority of palonosetron versus ondansetron during the acute phase (0-24 h post-chemotherapy) of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle through comparison of the difference in the proportions of patients who achieved a complete response with palonosetron (πT) minus ondansetron (πR) versus a preset non-inferiority margin (δ -15%). To be considered as non-inferior to ondansetron, for at least one of the doses of palonosetron, the lower limit of the 97·5% CI for the weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates had to be superior to -15%. Safety was assessed, according to treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01442376, and has been completed.
Between Sept 12, 2011, and Oct 26, 2012, we randomly assigned 502 patients; 169 were assigned to receive 10 μg/kg palonosetron, 169 to receive 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and 164 to receive 3 × 150 μg/kg ondansetron, of whom 166, 165, and 162, respectively, were included in the efficacy analysis. In the acute phase, complete responses were recorded in 90 (54%) patients in the 10 μg/kg palonosetron group, 98 (59%) in the 20 μg/kg palonosetron group, and 95 (59%) in the ondansetron group. Non-inferiority versus ondansetron was shown for 20 μg/kg palonosetron in the acute phase (weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates 0·36% [97·5% CI -11·7 to 12·4]; p=0·0022). Non-inferiority versus ondansetron was not shown for 10 μg/kg palonosetron in the acute phase (weighted sum of the differences in complete response rates -4·41% [97·5% CI -16·4 to 7·6]). In the first on-study treatment cycle, treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 134 (80%) of 167 patients who received 10 μg/kg palonosetron, 113 (69%) of 163 who received 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and 134 (82%) of 164 who received ondansetron. The most common drug-related treatment-emergent adverse events were nervous system disorders, mainly headache, which occurred in three (2%) patients who received 10 μg/kg palonosetron, one (<1%) patient who received 20 μg/kg palonosetron, and two (1%) patients who received ondansetron. The incidence of serious adverse events in the first on-study treatment cycle was lower in the 20 μg/kg palonosetron group (43 [26%]) than in the 10 μg/kg palonosetron group (52 [31%]) and the ondansetron group (55 [34%]).
Non-inferiority was shown for 20 μg/kg palonosetron during the acute phase of the first on-study chemotherapy cycle. 20 μg/kg palonosetron is now indicated by the European Medicines Agency and the US Food and Drug Administration for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in paediatric patients aged 1 month to younger than 17 years.
Helsinn Healthcare.
帕洛诺司琼在预防成人接受中高度致吐化疗的化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面显示出疗效。我们评估了帕洛诺司琼与昂丹司琼在预防儿科患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐方面的疗效和安全性。
在这项多中心、多国、双盲、双模拟、3 期研究中,年龄在 0 岁以下至 17 岁以下、既往未接受化疗或对化疗无反应、计划接受中高度致吐化疗治疗恶性疾病的儿科患者,根据静态中央随机化方案,按照年龄和致吐性分层,以 1:1:1 的比例随机接受 10 μg/kg 或 20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼(第 1 天),或 3 次 150 μg/kg 昂丹司琼(第 1 天,间隔 4 小时)。随机分配根据交互式网络响应系统进行分层。治疗分配对参与数据收集和分析的项目团队成员以及研究人员团队成员进行了屏蔽。主要终点是在研究期间首次化疗周期的急性期(化疗后 0-24 小时)中,接受中高度致吐化疗和活性研究药物的随机分配患者人群中无呕吐、无干呕或无使用解救药物的完全缓解率。主要疗效目标是通过比较帕洛诺司琼(πT)与昂丹司琼(πR)之间的差异,显示帕洛诺司琼在研究期间首次化疗周期的急性期(化疗后 0-24 小时)与昂丹司琼相比的非劣效性,差异比例(πT)减去昂丹司琼(πR)与预设的非劣效性边界(-15%)。为了被认为与昂丹司琼相比具有非劣效性,对于帕洛诺司琼的至少一种剂量,加权总和的差异完全缓解率的下限必须优于-15%。根据所接受的治疗进行安全性评估。本研究在 ClinicalTrials.gov 上注册,编号为 NCT01442376,已经完成。
在 2011 年 9 月 12 日至 2012 年 10 月 26 日之间,我们随机分配了 502 名患者;169 名患者接受 10 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼,169 名患者接受 20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼,164 名患者接受 3 次 150 μg/kg 昂丹司琼,其中分别有 166、165 和 162 名患者被纳入疗效分析。在急性期,10 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼组中有 90 名(54%)患者完全缓解,20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼组中有 98 名(59%)患者完全缓解,昂丹司琼组中有 95 名(59%)患者完全缓解。在急性期,20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼显示出与昂丹司琼的非劣效性(完全缓解率差异的加权总和为 0.36%[-11.7 至 12.4];p=0.0022)。在急性期,10 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼未显示出与昂丹司琼的非劣效性(完全缓解率差异的加权总和为-4.41%[-16.4 至 7.6])。在第一个研究治疗周期中,167 名接受 10 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼治疗的患者中有 134 名(80%)、163 名接受 20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼治疗的患者中有 113 名(69%)和 164 名接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者中有 134 名(82%)报告了治疗出现的不良事件。最常见的药物相关治疗出现的不良事件是神经系统疾病,主要是头痛,3 名(2%)接受 10 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼治疗的患者、1 名(<1%)接受 20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼治疗的患者和 2 名(1%)接受昂丹司琼治疗的患者发生。在第一个研究治疗周期中,20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼组(26%)的严重不良事件发生率低于 10 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼组(31%)和昂丹司琼组(34%)。
在研究期间首次化疗周期的急性期,显示了 20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼的非劣效性。欧洲药品管理局和美国食品和药物管理局现在已批准 20 μg/kg 帕洛诺司琼用于预防年龄在 1 个月至 17 岁的儿科患者化疗引起的恶心和呕吐。
Helsinn Healthcare。