Moore Miranda, Gibbons Claire, Cheng Newton, Coffman Megan, Petterson Stephen, Bazemore Andrew
Robert Graham Center, United States.
Robert Graham Center, United States.
Prim Care Diabetes. 2016 Aug;10(4):281-6. doi: 10.1016/j.pcd.2015.11.006. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
As the proportion of people with multiple chronic conditions grows, so does the complexity of patient care. Although office-based visits to subspecialists are expected to be intense, due to the focused nature of the visit, the complexity of office-based visits to primary care physicians has yet to be explored in depth. To explore complexity, we looked at diabetes as a case study to determine whether and how the complexity of office-based visits varies by physician specialty type, as measured by the number of diagnoses reported per visits.
The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data is used to create a nationally-representative sample of adults who self-report a diabetes diagnosis, the specialty of the treating physician for their care, and the number of diagnoses for each visit. Using cross tabulations, the distribution of office-based visits are analyzed based on a categorization of patients by number of visit diagnoses, number of conditions reported, and type of physician seen.
Almost 80 percent of visits made by adults with diabetes to subspecialist involved care for that single diagnosis; while 55 percent of visits to primary care involved care for at least one additional diagnosis. Almost 70 percent of visits in which only one diagnosis was reported were to subspecialist physicians. Almost 90 percent of visits in which four diagnoses were reported were to primary care physicians.
Office-based visits to primary care physicians are made increasingly complex by growing population morbidity. Adults with diabetes report more conditions being cared for per visit with primary care physicians than with subspecialty physicians. Future studies into where our results hold for other chronic conditions would be beneficial. As recent United States legislation moves health care payment toward paying for value and population health, encounter complexity should be accommodated.
随着患有多种慢性病的人群比例不断增加,患者护理的复杂性也日益提高。尽管预计专科医生的门诊会很密集,但由于门诊的针对性,基层医疗医生门诊的复杂性尚未得到深入探讨。为了探究复杂性,我们以糖尿病为例进行研究,以确定门诊的复杂性是否以及如何因医生专业类型而异,这通过每次门诊报告的诊断数量来衡量。
医疗支出小组调查数据用于创建一个具有全国代表性的成年人样本,这些成年人自我报告患有糖尿病诊断、治疗医生的专业以及每次门诊的诊断数量。使用交叉表,根据就诊诊断数量、报告的疾病数量和就诊医生类型对患者进行分类,分析门诊的分布情况。
患有糖尿病的成年人看专科医生的门诊中,近80%仅涉及该单一诊断的护理;而看基层医疗医生的门诊中,55%涉及至少一项额外诊断的护理。报告仅一项诊断的门诊中,近70%是看专科医生。报告四项诊断的门诊中,近90%是看基层医疗医生。
随着人群发病率的上升,基层医疗医生的门诊变得越来越复杂。患有糖尿病的成年人报告,每次看基层医疗医生时接受护理的疾病比看专科医生时更多。未来研究我们的结果是否适用于其他慢性病将是有益的。由于美国最近的立法将医疗保健支付转向按价值和人群健康支付,应考虑就诊复杂性。