Becker Theresa M, Prat Chantel S, Stocco Andrea
Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, 1715 Columbia Road N., Portage Bay Building, Box 357988, Seattle, WA 98195-7988, United States.
Institute for Learning and Brain Sciences, University of Washington, 1715 Columbia Road N., Portage Bay Building, Box 357988, Seattle, WA 98195-7988, United States; Department of Psychology, University of Washington, 119A Guthrie Hall, UW Box 351525, Seattle, WA 98195, United States.
Neuropsychologia. 2016 May;85:62-73. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.01.020. Epub 2016 Jan 18.
Mounting evidence suggests that bilingual development may change the brain in a way that gives rise to differences in non-linguistic cognitive functioning; however, only a limited number of studies have investigated the mechanism by which bilingualism shapes the brain. The current study used a network-level analysis to investigate differences in the mechanisms by which bilinguals and monolinguals flexibly adapt their neural networks in the face of novel task demands. Three competing hypotheses concerning differences in network-level adaptation were examined using Dynamic Causal Modeling of data from 15 bilinguals and 14 monolinguals who performed a Rapid Instructed Task Learning paradigm. The results demonstrated that the best-fitting model for the data from both groups specified that novel task execution is accomplished through a modulation of the influence of the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) on the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and on the striatum. Further examination of the best-fitting model revealed that ACC activity increased DLPFC and striatal activity in bilinguals but decreased activity in these regions in monolinguals. Interestingly, an increased positive connection between the ACC and striatum was associated with decreased accuracy across groups. Taken together, the results suggest that regardless of language experience, the ACC plays a critical role in cognitive flexibility, but the exact influence of the ACC on other primary control regions seems to be dependent on language experience. When paired with the behavioral results, these results suggest that bilinguals and monolinguals may employ different neurocognitive mechanisms for conflict monitoring to flexibly adapt to novel situations.
越来越多的证据表明,双语发展可能会以一种导致非语言认知功能差异的方式改变大脑;然而,只有少数研究调查了双语塑造大脑的机制。本研究使用网络水平分析来探究双语者和单语者在面对新的任务需求时灵活调整其神经网络的机制差异。使用动态因果模型对15名双语者和14名单语者的数据进行了分析,这些参与者执行了快速指导任务学习范式,以此检验了关于网络水平适应差异的三个相互竞争的假设。结果表明,两组数据的最佳拟合模型表明,新任务的执行是通过调节前扣带回皮质(ACC)对背外侧前额叶皮质(DLPFC)和纹状体的影响来完成的。对最佳拟合模型的进一步检验表明,ACC活动在双语者中增加了DLPFC和纹状体的活动,但在单语者中降低了这些区域的活动。有趣的是,ACC与纹状体之间增加的正向连接与两组的准确性下降有关。综合来看,结果表明,无论语言经验如何,ACC在认知灵活性中都起着关键作用,但ACC对其他主要控制区域的确切影响似乎取决于语言经验。与行为结果相结合,这些结果表明,双语者和单语者可能采用不同的神经认知机制进行冲突监测,以灵活适应新情况。