Savisaar Rosina, Hurst Laurence D
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, The Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom
Department of Biology and Biochemistry, The Milner Centre for Evolution, University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom.
Mol Biol Evol. 2016 Jun;33(6):1396-418. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msw018. Epub 2016 Jan 23.
Exonic splice enhancers (ESEs) are short nucleotide motifs, enriched near exon ends, that enhance the recognition of the splice site and thus promote splicing. Are intronless genes under selection to avoid these motifs so as not to attract the splicing machinery to an mRNA that should not be spliced, thereby preventing the production of an aberrant transcript? Consistent with this possibility, we find that ESEs in putative recent retrocopies are at a higher density and evolving faster than those in other intronless genes, suggesting that they are being lost. Moreover, intronless genes are less dense in putative ESEs than intron-containing ones. However, this latter difference is likely due to the skewed base composition of intronless sequences, a skew that is in line with the general GC richness of few exon genes. Indeed, after controlling for such biases, we find that both intronless and intron-containing genes are denser in ESEs than expected by chance. Importantly, nucleotide-controlled analysis of evolutionary rates at synonymous sites in ESEs indicates that the ESEs in intronless genes are under purifying selection in both human and mouse. We conclude that on the loss of introns, some but not all, ESE motifs are lost, the remainder having functions beyond a role in splice promotion. These results have implications for the design of intronless transgenes and for understanding the causes of selection on synonymous sites.
外显子剪接增强子(ESEs)是短核苷酸基序,在外显子末端附近富集,可增强剪接位点的识别,从而促进剪接。无内含子基因是否会受到选择以避免这些基序,从而不吸引剪接机制作用于不应被剪接的mRNA,进而防止异常转录本的产生?与这种可能性一致的是,我们发现假定的近期反转录拷贝中的ESEs密度更高,且比其他无内含子基因中的ESEs进化得更快,这表明它们正在丢失。此外,无内含子基因中假定的ESEs密度低于含内含子基因。然而,后一种差异可能是由于无内含子序列的碱基组成偏斜,这种偏斜与少数外显子基因普遍富含GC的情况一致。事实上,在控制了这种偏差之后,我们发现无内含子基因和含内含子基因中的ESEs密度都高于随机预期。重要的是,对ESEs同义位点进化速率的核苷酸控制分析表明,无内含子基因中的ESEs在人类和小鼠中都受到纯化选择。我们得出结论,在内含子丢失后,一些但不是所有的ESE基序会丢失,其余的具有超出促进剪接作用的功能。这些结果对无内含子转基因的设计以及理解同义位点选择的原因具有启示意义。