Nejad Afshin Sarafi, Noori Mohammad Reza Farrokhi, Haghdoost Ali Akbar, Bahaadinbeigy Kambiz, Abu-Hanna Ameen, Eslami Saeid
Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran; Medical Informatics Research Center, Institute for Futures Studies in Health, Kerman University of Medical Sciences, Kerman, Iran.
Medical Documents Audit Office of Kerman-Iranian Social Security Organization-SSOIR, Kerman, Iran.
Int J Med Inform. 2016 Mar;87:36-43. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.12.008. Epub 2015 Dec 19.
It is conjectured that providing feedback on physicians' prescribing behavior improves quality of drug prescriptions. However, the effectiveness of feedback provision and mode of feedback delivery is not well understood. The objective of this study was to assess and compare the effect of traditional paper letters (TPL) and short text message (STM) feedback on general practitioners' prescribing behavior of parenteral steroids (PSs).
In a single-blind randomized controlled trial, 906 general practitioners (GPs) having at least 10 monthly prescriptions were randomly recruited into two interventions and one control study arms with 1:1 allocation, stratified by percentage of prescriptions. The intervention was the provision of 3 feedback messages containing prescribing indices in TPL and STM (in the first two arms) versus the control arm (CG) with an interval of 3 months between these messages. We calculated the PS Defined Daily Dose (DDD) for every GP, every month, and compared between the 3 arms, before and after the interventions. The expected primary outcome was to reduce prescription of parenteral steroids by participants. The study was performed in the Kerman Social Security Organization in Iran.
A total of 906 GPs were selected for the trial, but only 721 of them (TPL=191, STM=228, CG=302) were recruited for the 1st feedback. The mean age of GPs was 44 and 59% of them were male. The prescribed parenteral steroid DDDs at baseline were similar (TPL=121.62, STM=127.49, CG=115.68, P>0.5). At the end of the study, DDDs in the TPL and STM arms were similar (TPL=104.38, STM=101.90, P>0.9) but DDDs in each intervention arm was statistically significantly lower than in CG (CG=156.17, P<0.0001). Being in TPL and STM arms resulted in 36.1 and 41.7 units of decrease in DDD respectively, compared to the control arm (P<0.02 and P<0.005) after the one-year duration of the study.
Feedback by TPLs and STMs on prescribing performance effectively reduced prescribing PSs by GPs. STM, being a cheap and fast tool, is potentially powerful and efficient for drug prescription rationalization.
据推测,提供关于医生处方行为的反馈可提高药物处方质量。然而,反馈提供的有效性和反馈传递方式尚不清楚。本研究的目的是评估和比较传统纸质信件(TPL)和短信息(STM)反馈对全科医生注射用类固醇(PSs)处方行为的影响。
在一项单盲随机对照试验中,将906名每月至少开具10份处方的全科医生(GPs)按处方百分比分层,以1:1的比例随机招募到两个干预组和一个对照组。干预措施是在前两个组中通过TPL和STM提供3条包含处方指标的反馈信息,对照组(CG)则不提供反馈信息,这些信息之间间隔3个月。我们计算了每个全科医生每月的PS限定日剂量(DDD),并在干预前后比较了3组之间的情况。预期的主要结果是减少参与者注射用类固醇的处方量。该研究在伊朗克尔曼社会保障组织进行。
总共906名全科医生被选入试验,但只有721名(TPL组=191名,STM组=228名,CG组=302名)被招募接受第一次反馈。全科医生的平均年龄为44岁,其中59%为男性。基线时注射用类固醇的DDD相似(TPL组=121.62,STM组=127.49,CG组=115.68,P>0.5)。在研究结束时,TPL组和STM组的DDD相似(TPL组=104.38,STM组=101.90,P>0.9),但各干预组的DDD在统计学上显著低于CG组(CG组=156.17,P<0.0001)。在为期一年的研究结束后,与对照组相比,TPL组和STM组的DDD分别减少了36.1和41.7单位(P<0.02和P<0.005)。
TPL和STM对处方表现的反馈有效地减少了全科医生注射用PSs的处方量。STM作为一种廉价且快速的工具,在药物处方合理化方面具有潜在的强大作用和高效性。